The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Feature selection and classification for microarray data analysis: Evolutionary methods for identifying predictive genes
Open accessAbstract
Background: In the clinical context, samples assayed by microarray are often classified by cell line or tumour type and it is of interest to discover a set of genes that can be used as class predictors. The leukemia dataset of Golub et al. [1] and the NCI60 dataset of Ross et al. [2] present multiclass classification problems where three tumour types and nine cell lines respectively must be identified. We apply an evolutionary algorithm to identify the near-optimal set of predictive genes that classify the data. We also examine the initial gene selection step whereby the most informative genes are selected from the genes assayed. Results: In the absence of feature selection, classification accuracy on the training data is typically good, but not replicated on the testing data. Gene selection using the RankGene software [3] is shown to significantly improve performance on the testing data. Further, we show that the choice of feature selection criteria can have a significant effect on accuracy. The evolutionary algorithm is shown to perform stably across the space of possible parameter settings – indicating the robustness of the approach. We assess performance using a low variance estimation technique, and present an analysis of the genes most often selected as predictors. Conclusion: The computational methods we have developed perform robustly and accurately, and yield results in accord with clinical knowledge: A Z-score analysis of the genes most frequently selected identifies genes known to discriminate AML and Pre-T ALL leukemia. This study also confirms that significantly different sets of genes are found to be most discriminatory as the sample classes are refined.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms
Mitchell, M. (1996) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3927.001.0001 · Cited by 11,340
Cited by
Gaur, A., Jewell, D. A., Liang, Y., Ridzon, D., Moore, J. H., Chen, C., Ambros, V. R., & Israel, M. A. (2007) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-06-2698 · Cited by 727
Machine learning and its applications to biology
Tarca, A. L., Carey, V. J., Chen, X.-W., Romero, R., & Drăghici, S. (2007) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030116 · Cited by 656
Markov blanket-embedded genetic algorithm for gene selection
Zhu, Z., Ong, Y.-S., & Dash, M. (2007) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2007.02.007 · Cited by 494
Ahn, K., Hoque, M. M., Song, G., Abdullah-Al-Wadud, M., & Chae, O. (2015) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2015.04.004 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Jirapech-Umpai, T., & Aitken, S.
- Venue
- BMC Bioinformatics
- Published
- 2005-06-15
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 148-148
- ISSN
- 1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2139151957
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Feature selection and classification for microarray data analysis: Evolutionary methods for identifying predictive genes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2105-6-148
- The paper
- Jirapech-Umpai, T., & Aitken, S. (2005). Feature selection and classification for microarray data analysis: Evolutionary methods for identifying predictive genes. BMC Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-6-148
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.