Cited by 9Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsFungal and yeast genetics researchGene Regulatory Network Analysis

An improved map of conserved regulatory sites for Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Open access
MacIsaac, Kenzie D, Wang, Ting, Gordon, D Benjamin, Gifford, David K, Stormo, Gary D, Fraenkel, Ernest·2006·BMC Bioinformatics

Abstract

Background: The regulatory map of a genome consists of the binding sites for proteins that determine the transcription of nearby genes. An initial regulatory map for S. cerevisiae was recently published using six motif discovery programs to analyze genome-wide chromatin immunoprecipitation data for 203 transcription factors. The programs were used to identify sequence motifs that were likely to correspond to the DNA-binding specificity of the immunoprecipitated proteins. We report improved versions of two conservation-based motif discovery algorithms, PhyloCon and Converge. Using these programs, we create a refined regulatory map for S. cerevisiae by reanalyzing the same chromatin immunoprecipitation data. Results: Applying the same conservative criteria that were applied in the original study, we find that PhyloCon and Converge each separately discover more known specificities than the combination of all six programs in the previous study. Combining the results of PhyloCon and Converge, we discover significant sequence motifs for 36 transcription factors that were previously missed. The new set of motifs identifies 636 more regulatory interactions than the previous one. The new network contains 28% more regulatory interactions among transcription factors, evidence of greater cross-talk between regulators. Conclusion: Combining two complementary computational strategies for conservation-based motif discovery improves the ability to identify the specificity of transcriptional regulators from genome-wide chromatin immunoprecipitation data. The increased sensitivity of these methods significantly expands the map of yeast regulatory sites without the need to alter any of the thresholds for statistical significance. The new map of regulatory sites reveals a more elaborate and complex view of the yeast genetic regulatory network than was observed previously.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2105-7-113

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The heme-dependent transcription factor Hap1 is also necessary for the expression of genes involved in ergosterol biosynthesis.

    “The heme-dependent transcription factor Hap1 is also necessary for the expression of genes involved in ergosterol biosynthesis (Figure 3A) [75,79,80,81,82].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 9

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. An Improved Map of Conserved Regulatory Sites for S. cerevisiae. http://fraenkel.mit.edu/improved_map/ PMC1435934 16522208

Authors
MacIsaac, K. D., Wang, T., Gordon, D. B., Gifford, D. K., Stormo, G. D., & Fraenkel, E.
Affiliations
  • Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Agilent Technologies (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Fraenkel, Ernest
Venue
BMC Bioinformatics
Published
2006-03-07
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
113-113
ISSN
1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1574231472
Cited by
9
References
30
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BMC Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons@Becker (Washington University School of Medicine) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • BioMed Central Ltd
Funders
  • Pfizer
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (HG00249, R01HG000249, 2T32HG00045, R01HG002668, T32HG000045)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
Keywords
Saccharomyces cerevisiae, transcription factor binding sites, motif discovery, CONVERGE, chromatin immunoprecipitation, transcriptional regulatory networks, regulatory interactions, DNA binding specificity
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Chromosome Mapping, Phylogeny, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Transcription Factors, Transcriptional Activation, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Conserved Sequence, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Regulatory Elements, Transcriptional

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review