The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A new measure for functional similarity of gene products based on Gene Ontology
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Gene Ontology (GO) is a standard vocabulary of functional terms and allows for coherent annotation of gene products. These annotations provide a basis for new methods that compare gene products regarding their molecular function and biological role. RESULTS: We present a new method for comparing sets of GO terms and for assessing the functional similarity of gene products. The method relies on two semantic similarity measures; simRel and funSim. One measure (simRel) is applied in the comparison of the biological processes found in different groups of organisms. The other measure (funSim) is used to find functionally related gene products within the same or between different genomes. Results indicate that the method, in addition to being in good agreement with established sequence similarity approaches, also provides a means for the identification of functionally related proteins independent of evolutionary relationships. The method is also applied to estimating functional similarity between all proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and to visualizing the molecular function space of yeast in a map of the functional space. A similar approach is used to visualize the functional relationships between protein families. CONCLUSION: The approach enables the comparison of the underlying molecular biology of different taxonomic groups and provides a new comparative genomics tool identifying functionally related gene products independent of homology. The proposed map of the functional space provides a new global view on the functional relationships between gene products or protein families.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology
Ashburner, M., Ball, C. A., Blake, J. A., Botstein, D., Butler, H., Cherry, J. M., Davis, A. P., Dolinski, K., Dwight, S. S., Eppig, J. T., et al. (2000) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/75556 · Cited by 43,206
Cited by
REVIGO summarizes and visualizes long lists of gene ontology terms
Supek, F., Bošnjak, M., Škunca, N., & Šmuc, T. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021800 · Cited by 6,264
GOSemSim: an R package for measuring semantic similarity among GO terms and gene products
Yu, G., Li, F., Qin, Y., Bo, X., Wu, Y., & Wang, S. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq064 · Cited by 1,388
Gene ontology semantic similarity analysis using GOSemSim
Yu, G. (2020) · Methods in Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-0301-7_11 · Cited by 392
The UK-PSCSC Consortium, Liu, J. Z., The International IBD Genetics Consortium, The International PSC Study Group, Hov, J. R., Folseraas, T., Ellinghaus, E., Rushbrook, S. M., Doncheva, N. T., Andreassen, O. A., et al. (2013) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2616 · Cited by 391
An Activity-Guided Map of Electrophile-Cysteine Interactions in Primary Human T Cells
Vinogradova, E. V., Zhang, X., Remillard, D., Lazar, D. C., Suciu, R. M., Wang, Y., Bianco, G., Yamashita, Y., Crowley, V. M., Schafroth, M. A., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.07.001 · Cited by 351
Metadata
- Authors
- Schlicker, A., Domingues, F. S., Rahnenführer, J., & Lengauer, T.
- Venue
- BMC Bioinformatics
- Published
- 2006-06-15
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 302-302
- ISSN
- 1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2121343862
- Cited by
- 692
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A new measure for functional similarity of gene products based on Gene Ontology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2105-7-302
- The paper
- Schlicker, A., Domingues, F. S., Rahnenführer, J., & Lengauer, T. (2006). A new measure for functional similarity of gene products based on Gene Ontology. BMC Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-302
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.