The DOI matches its Crossref record.
TreeDyn: towards dynamic graphics and annotations for analyses of trees
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Analyses of biomolecules for biodiversity, phylogeny or structure/function studies often use graphical tree representations. Many powerful tree editors are now available, but existing tree visualization tools make little use of meta-information related to the entities under study such as taxonomic descriptions or gene functions that can hardly be encoded within the tree itself (if using popular tree formats). Consequently, a tedious manual analysis and post-processing of the tree graphics are required if one needs to use external information for displaying or investigating trees. RESULTS: We have developed TreeDyn, a tool using annotations and dynamic graphical methods for editing and analyzing multiple trees. The main features of TreeDyn are 1) the management of multiple windows and multiple trees per window, 2) the export of graphics to several standard file formats with or without HTML encapsulation and a new format called TGF, which enables saving and restoring graphical analysis, 3) the projection of texts or symbols facing leaf labels or linked to nodes, through manual pasting or by using annotation files, 4) the highlight of graphical elements after querying leaf labels (or annotations) or by selection of graphical elements and information extraction, 5) the highlight of targeted trees according to a source tree browsed by the user, 6) powerful scripts for automating repetitive graphical tasks, 7) a command line interpreter enabling the use of TreeDyn through CGI scripts for online building of trees, 8) the inclusion of a library of packages dedicated to specific research fields involving trees. CONCLUSION: TreeDyn is a tree visualization and annotation tool which includes tools for tree manipulation and annotation and uses meta-information through dynamic graphical operators or scripting to help analyses and annotations of single trees or tree collections.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Phylogeny.fr: robust phylogenetic analysis for the non-specialist
Dereeper, A., Guignon, V., Blanc, G., Audic, S., Buffet, S., Chevenet, F., Dufayard, J.-F., Guindon, S., Lefort, V., Lescot, M., et al. (2008) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkn180 · Cited by 4,700
Self-citationInteractive Tree Of Life v2: online annotation and display of phylogenetic trees made easy
Letunic, I., & Bork, P. (2011) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkr201 · Cited by 1,457
Argout, X., Salse, J., Aury, J.-M., Guiltinan, M. J., Droc, G., Gouzy, J., Allegre, M., Chaparro, C., Legavre, T., Maximova, S. N., et al. (2011) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.736 · Cited by 746
Visual comparison for information visualization
Gleicher, M., Albers, D., Walker, R., Jusufi, I., Hansen, C. D., & Roberts, J. C. (2011) · Information Visualization · doi:10.1177/1473871611416549 · Cited by 567
Inside HDACs with more selective HDAC inhibitors
Roche, J., & Bertrand, P. (2016) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2016.05.047 · Cited by 312
Metadata
- Authors
- Chevenet, F., Brun, C., Bañuls, A.-L., Jacq, B., & Christen, R.
- Venue
- BMC Bioinformatics
- Published
- 2006-10-10
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 439-439
- ISSN
- 1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1521650410
- Cited by
- 1,061
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: TreeDyn: towards dynamic graphics and annotations for analyses of trees. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2105-7-439
- The paper
- Chevenet, F., Brun, C., Bañuls, A.-L., Jacq, B., & Christen, R. (2006). TreeDyn: towards dynamic graphics and annotations for analyses of trees. BMC Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-439
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.