The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Glycosylation site prediction using ensembles of Support Vector Machine classifiers
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Glycosylation is one of the most complex post-translational modifications (PTMs) of proteins in eukaryotic cells. Glycosylation plays an important role in biological processes ranging from protein folding and subcellular localization, to ligand recognition and cell-cell interactions. Experimental identification of glycosylation sites is expensive and laborious. Hence, there is significant interest in the development of computational methods for reliable prediction of glycosylation sites from amino acid sequences. RESULTS: We explore machine learning methods for training classifiers to predict the amino acid residues that are likely to be glycosylated using information derived from the target amino acid residue and its sequence neighbors. We compare the performance of Support Vector Machine classifiers and ensembles of Support Vector Machine classifiers trained on a dataset of experimentally determined N-linked, O-linked, and C-linked glycosylation sites extracted from O-GlycBase version 6.00, a database of 242 proteins from several different species. The results of our experiments show that the ensembles of Support Vector Machine classifiers outperform single Support Vector Machine classifiers on the problem of predicting glycosylation sites in terms of a range of standard measures for comparing the performance of classifiers. The resulting methods have been implemented in EnsembleGly, a web server for glycosylation site prediction. CONCLUSION: Ensembles of Support Vector Machine classifiers offer an accurate and reliable approach to automated identification of putative glycosylation sites in glycoprotein sequences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ensemble methods in machine learning
Dietterich, T. G. (2000) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-45014-9_1 · Cited by 8,408
Role of Glycosylation in Development
Haltiwanger, R. S., & Lowe, J. B. (2004) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.074043 · Cited by 757
Cited by
Post-translational modifications in proteins: resources, tools and prediction methods
Ramazi, S., & Zahiri, J. (2021) · Database · doi:10.1093/database/baab012 · Cited by 772
A Review of Ensemble Methods in Bioinformatics
Yang, P., Hwa Yang, Y., B. Zhou, B., & Y. Zomaya, A. (2010) · Current Bioinformatics · doi:10.2174/157489310794072508 · Cited by 503
Stanley, P. (2011) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a005199 · Cited by 455
Artificial intelligence (AI) in rare diseases: is the future brighter?
Brasil, S., Pascoal, C., Francisco, R., dos Reis Ferreira, V., A. Videira, P., & Valadão, G. (2019) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes10120978 · Cited by 160
Henderson, G. E., Isett, K. D., & Gerngross, T. U. (2011) · Bioconjugate Chemistry · doi:10.1021/bc100510g · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Caragea, C., Sinapov, J., Silvescu, A., Dobbs, D., & Honavar, V.
- Venue
- BMC Bioinformatics
- Published
- 2007-11-09
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 438-438
- ISSN
- 1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2063768466
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Glycosylation site prediction using ensembles of Support Vector Machine classifiers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2105-8-438
- The paper
- Caragea, C., Sinapov, J., Silvescu, A., Dobbs, D., & Honavar, V. (2007). Glycosylation site prediction using ensembles of Support Vector Machine classifiers. BMC Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-8-438
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.