The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enhanced Bayesian modelling in BAPS software for learning genetic structures of populations
Open accessAbstract
Background: During the most recent decade many Bayesian statistical models and software for answering questions related to the genetic structure underlying population samples have appeared in the scientific literature. Most of these methods utilize molecular markers for the inferences, while some are also capable of handling DNA sequence data. In a number of earlier works, we have introduced an array of statistical methods for population genetic inference that are implemented in the software BAPS. However, the complexity of biological problems related to genetic structure analysis keeps increasing such that in many cases the current methods may provide either inappropriate or insufficient solutions. Results: We discuss the necessity of enhancing the statistical approaches to face the challenges posed by the ever-increasing amounts of molecular data generated by scientists over a wide range of research areas and introduce an array of new statistical tools implemented in the most recent version of BAPS. With these methods it is possible, e.g., to fit genetic mixture models using user-specified numbers of clusters and to estimate levels of admixture under a genetic linkage model. Also, alleles representing a different ancestry compared to the average observed genomic positions can be tracked for the sampled individuals, and a priori specified hypotheses about genetic population structure can be directly compared using Bayes' theorem. In general, we have improved further the computational characteristics of the algorithms behind the methods implemented in BAPS facilitating the analyses of large and complex datasets. In particular, analysis of a single dataset can now be spread over multiple computers using a script interface to the software. Conclusion: The Bayesian modelling methods introduced in this article represent an array of enhanced tools for learning the genetic structure of populations. Their implementations in the BAPS software are designed to meet the increasing need for analyzing large-scale population genetics data. The software is freely downloadable for Windows, Linux and Mac OS X systems at http://web.abo.fi/fak/mnf//mate/jc/software/baps.html.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lauritzen, S. L. (1996) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198522195.001.0001 · Cited by 2,976
Cited by
Multilocus sequence typing as a replacement for serotyping in Salmonella enterica
Achtman, M., Wain, J., Weill, F.-X., Nair, S., Zhou, Z., Sangal, V., Krauland, M. G., Hale, J. L., Harbottle, H., Uesbeck, A., et al. (2012) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1002776 · Cited by 710
Murray, G. G. R., Charlesworth, J., Miller, E. L., Casey, M. J., Lloyd, C. T., Gottschalk, M., Tucker, A. W. (., Welch, J. J., & Weinert, L. A. (2021) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msaa323 · Cited by 101
Basto, M. P., Santos-Reis, M., Simões, L., Grilo, C., Cardoso, L., Cortes, H., Bruford, M. W., & Fernandes, C. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0145165 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Corander, J., Marttinen, P., Sirén, J., & Tang, J.
- Venue
- BMC Bioinformatics
- Published
- 2008-12
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 539-539
- ISSN
- 1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2059759656
- Cited by
- 874
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.