The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cryptic animal species are homogeneously distributed among taxa and biogeographical regions
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Cryptic species are two or more distinct but morphologically similar species that were classified as a single species. During the past two decades we observed an exponential growth of publications on cryptic species. Recently published reviews have demonstrated cryptic species have profound consequences on many biological disciplines. It has been proposed that their distribution is non-random across taxa and biomes. RESULTS: We analysed a literature database for the taxonomic and biogeographical distribution of cryptic animal species reports. Results from regression analysis indicate that cryptic species are almost evenly distributed among major metazoan taxa and biogeographical regions when corrected for species richness and study intensity. CONCLUSION: This indicates that morphological stasis represents an evolutionary constant and that cryptic metazoan diversity does predictably affect estimates of earth's animal diversity. Our findings have direct theoretical and practical consequences for a number of prevailing biological questions with regard to global biodiversity estimates, conservation efforts and global taxonomic initiatives.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Biogeography of the Indo-Australian Archipelago
Lohman, D. J., de Bruyn, M., Page, T., von Rintelen, K., Hall, R., Ng, P. K. L., Shih, H.-T., Carvalho, G. R., & von Rintelen, T. (2011) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102710-145001 · Cited by 580
Cryptic species as a window into the paradigm shift of the species concept
Fišer, C., Robinson, C. T., & Malard, F. (2018) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.14486 · Cited by 574
What we know and don’t know about Earth's missing biodiversity
Scheffers, B. R., Joppa, L. N., Pimm, S. L., & Laurance, W. F. (2012) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2012.05.008 · Cited by 437
Madagascar as a model region of species diversification
Vences, M., Wollenberg, K. C., Vieites, D. R., & Lees, D. C. (2009) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.011 · Cited by 414
Vertebrate biodiversity losses point to a sixth mass extinction
McCallum, M. L. (2015) · Biodiversity and Conservation · doi:10.1007/s10531-015-0940-6 · Cited by 163
Metadata
- Authors
- Pfenninger, M., & Schwenk, K.
- Venue
- BMC Evolutionary Biology
- Published
- 2007
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 121
- ISSN
- 1471-2148 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2026740844
- Cited by
- 652
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cryptic animal species are homogeneously distributed among taxa and biogeographical regions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2148-7-121
- The paper
- Pfenninger, M., & Schwenk, K. (2007). Cryptic animal species are homogeneously distributed among taxa and biogeographical regions. BMC Evolutionary Biology. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-7-121
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.