Parasite resistance and the adaptive significance of sleep
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Sleep is a biological enigma. Despite occupying much of an animal's life, and having been scrutinized by numerous experimental studies, there is still no consensus on its function. Similarly, no hypothesis has yet explained why species have evolved such marked variation in their sleep requirements (from 3 to 20 hours a day in mammals). One intriguing but untested idea is that sleep has evolved by playing an important role in protecting animals from parasitic infection. This theory stems, in part, from clinical observations of intimate physiological links between sleep and the immune system. Here, we test this hypothesis by conducting comparative analyses of mammalian sleep, immune system parameters, and parasitism. RESULTS: We found that evolutionary increases in mammalian sleep durations are strongly associated with an enhancement of immune defences as measured by the number of immune cells circulating in peripheral blood. This appeared to be a generalized relationship that could be independently detected in 4 of the 5 immune cell types and in both of the main sleep phases. Importantly, no comparable relationships occur in related physiological systems that do not serve an immune function. Consistent with an influence of sleep on immune investment, mammalian species that sleep for longer periods also had substantially reduced levels of parasitic infection. CONCLUSION: These relationships suggest that parasite resistance has played an important role in the evolution of mammalian sleep. Species that have evolved longer sleep durations appear to be able to increase investment in their immune systems and be better protected from parasites. These results are neither predicted nor explained by conventional theories of sleep evolution, and suggest that sleep has a much wider role in disease resistance than is currently appreciated.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Evolutionary increases in mammalian sleep duration are associated with a higher number of circulating immune cells and reduced levels of parasitic infections.
“Taking an evolutionary approach, Preston et al. (453) revealed that evolutionary increases in mammalian sleep duration are associated with a higher number of circulating immune cells and reduced levels of parasitic infections (encompassing viral, bacterial, and macroparasitic infections).”
From The Sleep-Immune Crosstalk in Health and Disease (2019) · cites this paper as [453]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 84 · Cited by 130
- Authors
- Preston, B. T., Capellini, I., McNamara, P., Barton, R. A., & Nunn, C. L.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology (DE)
- Durham University (GB)
- Boston University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Preston, Brian T
- Venue
- BMC Evolutionary Biology
- Published
- 2009
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 7
- ISSN
- 1471-2148 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2631508
- OpenAlex
- W2020128930
- Cited by
- 130
- References
- 84
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 5.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- BMC Evolutionary Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Repository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
- OpenBU (Boston University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH070415)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Keywords
- sleep evolution, parasite resistance, immune investment, parasitic infection, immune cell counts, disease resistance, comparative physiology
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Biological Evolution, Host-Parasite Interactions, Immunity, Innate, Mammals, Parasites, Parasitic Diseases, Sleep
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review