The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
BLAST Ring Image Generator (BRIG): simple prokaryote genome comparisons
Open accessAbstract
Background: Visualisation of genome comparisons is invaluable for helping to determine genotypic differences between closely related prokaryotes. New visualisation and abstraction methods are required in order to improve the validation, interpretation and communication of genome sequence information; especially with the increasing amount of data arising from next-generation sequencing projects. Visualising a prokaryote genome as a circular image has become a powerful means of displaying informative comparisons of one genome to a number of others. Several programs, imaging libraries and internet resources already exist for this purpose, however, most are either limited in the number of comparisons they can show, are unable to adequately utilise draft genome sequence data, or require a knowledge of command-line scripting for implementation. Currently, there is no freely available desktop application that enables users to rapidly visualise comparisons between hundreds of draft or complete genomes in a single image. Results: BLAST Ring Image Generator (BRIG) can generate images that show multiple prokaryote genome comparisons, without an arbitrary limit on the number of genomes compared. The output image shows similarity between a central reference sequence and other sequences as a set of concentric rings, where BLAST matches are coloured on a sliding scale indicating a defined percentage identity. Images can also include draft genome assembly information to show read coverage, assembly breakpoints and collapsed repeats. In addition, BRIG supports the mapping of unassembled sequencing reads against one or more central reference sequences. Many types of custom data and annotations can be shown using BRIG, making it a versatile approach for visualising a range of genomic comparison data. BRIG is readily accessible to any user, as it assumes no specialist computational knowledge and will perform all required file parsing and BLAST comparisons automatically. Conclusions: There is a clear need for a user-friendly program that can produce genome comparisons for a large number of prokaryote genomes with an emphasis on rapidly utilising unfinished or unassembled genome data. Here we present BRIG, a cross-platform application that enables the interactive generation of comparative genomic images via a simple graphical-user interface. BRIG is freely available for all operating systems at http://sourceforge.net/projects/brig/.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basic local alignment search tool
Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., & Lipman, D. J. (1990) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999 · Cited by 98,669
Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform
Li, H., & Durbin, R. (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 · Cited by 58,607
Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes
Kurtz, S., Phillippy, A., Delcher, A. L., Smoot, M., Shumway, M., Antonescu, C., & Salzberg, S. L. (2004) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2004-5-2-r12 · Cited by 5,254
McClelland, M., Sanderson, K. E., Clifton, S. W., Latreille, P., Porwollik, S., Sabo, A., Meyer, R., Bieri, T., Ozersky, P., McLellan, M., et al. (2004) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1470 · Cited by 391
Cited by
Pathogens and host immunity in the ancient human oral cavity
Warinner, C., Rodrigues, J. F. M., Vyas, R., Trachsel, C., Shved, N., Grossmann, J., Radini, A., Hancock, Y., Tito, R. Y., Fiddyment, S., et al. (2014) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2906 · Cited by 618
Zhai, R., Xue, X., Zhang, L., Yang, X., Zhao, L., & Zhang, C. (2019) · Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fcimb.2019.00239 · Cited by 368
Metagenomic analysis of a Mexican ripened cheese reveals a unique complex microbiota
Escobar-Zepeda, A., Sanchez-Flores, A., & Quirasco Baruch, M. (2016) · Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.fm.2016.02.004 · Cited by 174
Suzuki, S., Ishii, S., Hoshino, T., Rietze, A., Tenney, A., Morrill, P. L., Inagaki, F., Kuenen, J. G., & Nealson, K. H. (2017) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2017.111 · Cited by 78
Rapid Diagnosis of Lower Respiratory Infection using Nanopore-based Clinical Metagenomics
Charalampous, T., Richardson, H., Kay, G. L., Baldan, R., Jeanes, C., Rae, D., Grundy, S., Turner, D. J., Wain, J., Leggett, R. M., et al. (2018) · doi:10.1101/387548 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Alikhan, N.-F., Petty, N. K., Ben Zakour, N. L., & Beatson, S. A.
- Venue
- BMC Genomics
- Published
- 2011-08-08
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 402-402
- ISSN
- 1471-2164 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2091030812
- Cited by
- 3,303
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 15.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: BLAST Ring Image Generator (BRIG): simple prokaryote genome comparisons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2164-12-402
- The paper
- Alikhan, N.-F., Petty, N. K., Ben Zakour, N. L., & Beatson, S. A. (2011). BLAST Ring Image Generator (BRIG): simple prokaryote genome comparisons. BMC Genomics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-12-402
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.