Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 225

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genetic analysis of DNA methylation and gene expression levels in whole blood of healthy human subjects

Open access
van Eijk, Kristel R, de Jong, Simone, Boks, Marco PM, Langeveld, Terry, Colas, Fabrice, Veldink, Jan H, de Kovel, Carolien GF, Janson, Esther, Strengman, Eric, Langfelder, Peter, Kahn, René S, van den Berg, Leonard H, Horvath, Steve, Ophoff, Roel A·2012·BMC Genomics

Abstract

Background: The predominant model for regulation of gene expression through DNA methylation is an inverse association in which increased methylation results in decreased gene expression levels. However, recent studies suggest that the relationship between genetic variation, DNA methylation and expression is more complex. Results: Systems genetic approaches for examining relationships between gene expression and methylation array data were used to find both negative and positive associations between these levels. A weighted correlation network analysis revealed that i) both transcriptome and methylome are organized in modules, ii) co-expression modules are generally not preserved in the methylation data and vice-versa, and iii) highly significant correlations exist between co-expression and co-methylation modules, suggesting the existence of factors that affect expression and methylation of different modules (i.e., trans effects at the level of modules). We observed that methylation probes associated with expression in cis were more likely to be located outside CpG islands, whereas specificity for CpG island shores was present when methylation, associated with expression, was under local genetic control. A structural equation model based analysis found strong support in particular for a traditional causal model in which gene expression is regulated by genetic variation via DNA methylation instead of gene expression affecting DNA methylation levels. Conclusions: Our results provide new insights into the complex mechanisms between genetic markers, epigenetic mechanisms and gene expression. We find strong support for the classical model of genetic variants regulating methylation, which in turn regulates gene expression. Moreover we show that, although the methylation and expression modules differ, they are highly correlated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2164-13-636

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Cited by

See all 225

Metadata

Authors
van Eijk, K. R., de Jong, S., Boks, M. P., Langeveld, T., Colas, F., Veldink, J. H., de Kovel, C. G., Janson, E., Strengman, E., Langfelder, P., Kahn, R. S., van den Berg, L. H., Horvath, S., & Ophoff, R. A.
Venue
BMC Genomics
Published
2012-11-17
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
636-636
ISSN
1471-2164 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2102893853
Cited by
225
References
17
FWCI
7.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genetic analysis of DNA methylation and gene expression levels in whole blood of healthy human subjects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2164-13-636
The paper
van Eijk, K. R., de Jong, S., Boks, M. P., Langeveld, T., Colas, F., Veldink, J. H., de Kovel, C. G., Janson, E., Strengman, E., Langfelder, P., Kahn, R. S., van den Berg, L. H., Horvath, S., & Ophoff, R. A. (2012). Genetic analysis of DNA methylation and gene expression levels in whole blood of healthy human subjects. BMC Genomics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-13-636

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.