The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Selection of housekeeping genes for gene expression studies in human reticulocytes using real-time PCR
Open accessAbstract
Background: Control genes, which are often referred to as housekeeping genes, are frequently used to normalise mRNA levels between different samples. However, the expression level of these genes may vary among tissues or cells and may change under certain circumstances. Thus, the selection of housekeeping genes is critical for gene expression studies. To address this issue, 7 candidate housekeeping genes including several commonly used ones were investigated in isolated human reticulocytes. For this, a simple ΔCt approach was employed by comparing relative expression of 'pairs of genes' within each sample. On this basis, stability of the candidate housekeeping genes was ranked according to repeatability of the gene expression differences among 31 samples. Results: Initial screening of the expression pattern demonstrated that 1 of the 7 genes was expressed at very low levels in reticulocytes and was excluded from further analysis. The range of expression stability of the other 6 genes was (from most stable to least stable): GAPDH (glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase), SDHA (succinate dehydrogenase), HPRT1 (hypoxanthine phosphoribosyl transferase 1), HBS1L (HBS1-like protein) and AHSP (alpha haemoglobin stabilising protein), followed by B2M (beta-2-microglobulin). Conclusion: Using this simple approach, GAPDH was found to be the most suitable housekeeping gene for expression studies in reticulocytes while the commonly used B2M should be avoided.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Lourenço, A. P., Mackert, A., dos Santos Cristino, A., & Simões, Z. L. P. (2008) · Apidologie · doi:10.1051/apido:2008015 · Cited by 355
Kuang, J., Yan, X., Genders, A. J., Granata, C., & Bishop, D. J. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0196438 · Cited by 207
Coan, P. M., Vaughan, O. R., Sekita, Y., Finn, S. L., Burton, G. J., Constancia, M., & Fowden, A. L. (2010) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2009.181214 · Cited by 199
Impaired Wnt Signaling in the Prefrontal Cortex of Alzheimer’s Disease
Folke, J., Pakkenberg, B., & Brudek, T. (2019) · Molecular Neurobiology · doi:10.1007/s12035-018-1103-z · Cited by 123
Aberrant Wnt signaling pathway in medial temporal lobe structures of Alzheimer’s disease
Riise, J., Plath, N., Pakkenberg, B., & Parachikova, A. (2015) · Journal of Neural Transmission · doi:10.1007/s00702-015-1375-7 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Silver, N., Best, S., Jiang, J., & Thein, S. L.
- Venue
- BMC Molecular Biology
- Published
- 2006-10-06
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 33-33
- ISSN
- 1471-2199 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2111427334
- Cited by
- 1,722
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Selection of housekeeping genes for gene expression studies in human reticulocytes using real-time PCR. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2199-7-33
- The paper
- Silver, N., Best, S., Jiang, J., & Thein, S. L. (2006). Selection of housekeeping genes for gene expression studies in human reticulocytes using real-time PCR. BMC Molecular Biology. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2199-7-33
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.