Complex synapses as efficient memory systems
Open accessAbstract
The molecular machinery underlying memory consolidation at the level of synaptic connections is believed to employ a complex network of highly diverse biochemical processes that operate on a wide range of different timescales. An appropriate theoretical framework could help us identify their computational roles and understand how these intricate networks of interactions support synaptic memory formation and maintenance. Here we construct a broad class of synaptic models that can efficiently harness biological complexity to store and preserve a huge number of memories, vastly outperforming other synaptic models of memory. The number of storable memories grows almost linearly with the number of synapses, which constitutes a substantial improvement over the square root scaling of previous models [1,2], especially when large neural systems are considered. This improvement is obtained without significantly reducing the initial memory strength, which still scales approximately like the square root of the number of synapses. This is achieved by combining together multiple dynamical processes that operate on different timescales, to ensure the memory strength decays as slowly as the inverse square root of the age of the corresponding synaptic modification. Memories are initially stored in fast variables and then progressively transferred to slower ones. Importantly, in our case the interactions between fast and slow variables are bidirectional, in contrast to the unidirectional cascades of previous models. The proposed models are robust to perturbations of parameters and can capture several properties of biological memories, which include delayed expression of synaptic potentiation and depression, synaptic metaplasticity, and spacing effects. We discuss predictions for the autocorrelation function of the synaptic efficacy that can be tested in plasticity experiments involving long sequences of synaptic modifications.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Hierarchical memory structures optimize information organization through multi-level formats enabling efficient retrieval, demonstrated by Experience-based Hierarchical Control frameworks with rapid memory access modules, memory consolidation processes through bidirectional fast-slow variable interactions, and Adaptive Cross-Attention Networks dynamically ranking memories based on query relevance.
“Hierarchical memory structures optimize information organization through multi-level formats enabling efficient retrieval, demonstrated by Experience-based Hierarchical Control frameworks with rapid memory access modules [868], memory consolidation processes through bidirectional fast-slow variable interactions [63], and Adaptive Cross-Attention Networks dynamically ranking memories based on query”
From A Survey of Context Engineering for Large Language Models (2025) · cites this paper as [63]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Fusi S Drew PJ Abbott LF Cascade models of synaptically stored memories Neuron 2005 45 4 599 611 15721245
- Roxin A Fusi S Efficient partitioning of memory systems and its importance for memory consolidation PLoS Comput Biol 2013 9 7 e1003146 23935470 PMC3723499
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Survey of Context Engineering for Large Language Models
Mei, L., Yao, J., Ge, Y., Wang, Y., Bi, B., Cai, Y., Liu, J., Li, M., Li, Z.-Z., Zhang, D., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.13334 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
- Authors
- Benna, M. K., & Fusi, S.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Benna, Marcus K
- Venue
- BMC Neuroscience
- Published
- 2015-12
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- S1
- ISSN
- 1471-2202 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4697483
- OpenAlex
- W2268505509
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- BMC Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Keywords
- memory consolidation, synaptic plasticity, memory capacity, time-scale separation, bidirectional interaction, synaptic potentiation and depression, spacing effect
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review