Cited by 53Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans researchNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Discordant localization of WFA reactivity and brevican/ADAMTS-derived fragment in rodent brain

Open access
Ajmo, Joanne M, Eakin, Autumn K, Hamel, Michelle G, Gottschall, Paul E·2008·BMC Neuroscience

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Proteoglycan (PG) in the extracellular matrix (ECM) of the central nervous system (CNS) may act as a barrier for neurite elongation in a growth tract, and regulate other characteristics collectively defined as structural neural plasticity. Proteolytic cleavage of PGs appears to alter the environment to one favoring plasticity and growth. Brevican belongs to the lectican family of aggregating, chondroitin sulfate (CS)-bearing PGs, and it modulates neurite outgrowth and synaptogenesis. Several ADAMTSs (a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs) are glutamyl-endopeptidases that proteolytically cleave brevican. The purpose of this study was to localize regions of adult CNS that contain a proteolytic-derived fragment of brevican which bears the ADAMTS-cleaved neoepitope sequence. These regions were compared to areas of Wisteria floribunda agglutin (WFA) reactivity, a common reagent used to detect "perineuronal nets" (PNNs) of intact matrix and a marker which is thought to label regions of relative neural stability. RESULTS: WFA reactivity was found primarily as PNNs, whereas brevican and the ADAMTS-cleaved fragment of brevican were more broadly distributed in neuropil, and in particular regions localized to PNNs. One example is hippocampus where the ADAMTS-cleaved brevican fragment is found surrounding pyramidal neurons, in neuropil of stratum oriens/radiatum and the lacunosum moleculare. The fragment was less abundant in the molecular layer of the dentate gyrus. Mostly PNNs of scattered interneurons along the pyramidal layer were identified by WFA. In lateral thalamus, the reticular thalamic nucleus stained abundantly with WFA whereas ventral posterior nuclei were markedly immunopositive for ADAMTS-cleaved brevican. Using Western blotting techniques, no common species were reactive for brevican and WFA. CONCLUSION: In general, a marked discordance was observed in the regional localization between WFA and brevican or the ADAMTS-derived N-terminal fragment of brevican. Functionally, this difference may correspond to regions with varied prevalence for neural stability/plasticity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2202-9-14

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • WFA-labeled PNNs are associated with more heterogeneous neuronal phenotypes than previously thought, including several subgroups of interneurons, a small subset of cortico-cortical pyramidal cells, spinal cord motor neurons, and cerebellum Purkinje cells.

    “More recent evidence indicates that WFA-labeled PNNs are associated with more heterogeneous neuronal phenotypes than previously thought, including several subgroups of interneurons, a small subset of cortico-cortical pyramidal cells, spinal cord motor neurons and cerebellum Purkinje cells (Ajmo et al., 2008; Brauer et al., 1995; Bruckner et al., 1993; Gati and Lendvai, 2013; Hartig et al., 1995;”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 53

Authors
Ajmo, J. M., Eakin, A. K., Hamel, M. G., & Gottschall, P. E.
Affiliations
University of South Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Gottschall, Paul E
Venue
BMC Neuroscience
Published
2008-01-25
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
14-14
ISSN
1471-2202 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2092551589
Cited by
53
References
39
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BMC Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Alzheimer's Association
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (AG022101, R01AG022101)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
brevican, ADAMTS, proteolytic cleavage, Wisteria floribunda agglutinin, perineuronal nets, extracellular matrix proteoglycans, lecticans, chondroitin sulfate, neuroplasticity, hippocampus, lateral thalamus, thalamic reticular nucleus, dentate gyrus, neuropil, immunolocalization
MeSH terms
ADAMTS4 Protein, Animals, Brain Chemistry, Humans, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Procollagen N-Endopeptidase, Chondroitin Sulfate Proteoglycans, Rodentia, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Receptors, N-Acetylglucosamine, Plant Lectins, Lectins, C-Type, Mice, Rats, ADAM Proteins, Brevican

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review