The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Discovery of chemically induced mutations in rice by TILLING
Open accessAbstract
Background: Rice is both a food source for a majority of the world's population and an important model system. Available functional genomics resources include targeted insertion mutagenesis and transgenic tools. While these can be powerful, a non-transgenic, unbiased targeted mutagenesis method that can generate a range of allele types would add considerably to the analysis of the rice genome. TILLING (Targeting Induced Local Lesions in Genomes), a general reverse genetic technique that combines traditional mutagenesis with high throughput methods for mutation discovery, is such a method. Results: To apply TILLING to rice, we developed two mutagenized rice populations. One population was developed by treatment with the chemical mutagen ethyl methanesulphonate (EMS), and the other with a combination of sodium azide plus methyl-nitrosourea (Az-MNU). To find induced mutations, target regions of 0.7–1.5 kilobases were PCR amplified using gene specific primers labeled with fluorescent dyes. Heteroduplexes were formed through denaturation and annealing of PCR products, mismatches digested with a crude preparation of CEL I nuclease and cleaved fragments visualized using denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. In 10 target genes screened, we identified 27 nucleotide changes in the EMS-treated population and 30 in the Az-MNU population. Conclusion: We estimate that the density of induced mutations is two- to threefold higher than previously reported rice populations (about 1/300 kb). By comparison to other plants used in public TILLING services, we conclude that the populations described here would be suitable for use in a large scale TILLING project.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Biofortified crops to alleviate micronutrient malnutrition
Mayer, J. E., Pfeiffer, W. H., & Beyer, P. (2008) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2008.01.007 · Cited by 499
TILLING to detect induced mutations in soybean
Cooper, J. L., Till, B. J., Laport, R. G., Darlow, M. C., Kleffner, J. M., Jamai, A., El-Mellouki, T., Liu, S., Ritchie, R., Nielsen, N., et al. (2008) · BMC Plant Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2229-8-9 · Cited by 300
Self-citationDiscovery of Rare Mutations in Populations: TILLING by Sequencing
Tsai, H., Howell, T., Nitcher, R., Missirian, V., Watson, B., Ngo, K. J., Lieberman, M., Fass, J., Uauy, C., Tran, R. K., et al. (2011) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.110.169748 · Cited by 265
Self-citationUTILLdb, a Pisum sativum in silicoforward and reverse genetics tool
Dalmais, M., Schmidt, J., Le Signor, C., Moussy, F., Burstin, J., Savois, V., Aubert, G., Brunaud, V., de Oliveira, Y., Guichard, C., et al. (2008) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2008-9-2-r43 · Cited by 187
Triques, K., Sturbois, B., Gallais, S., Dalmais, M., Chauvin, S., Clepet, C., Aubourg, S., Rameau, C., Caboche, M., & Bendahmane, A. (2007) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2007.03201.x · Cited by 145
Metadata
- Authors
- Till, B. J., Cooper, J., Tai, T. H., Colowit, P., Greene, E. A., Henikoff, S., & Comai, L.
- Venue
- BMC Plant Biology
- Published
- 2007-04-11
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 19-19
- ISSN
- 1471-2229 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2055705050
- Cited by
- 465
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Discovery of chemically induced mutations in rice by TILLING. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2229-7-19
- The paper
- Till, B. J., Cooper, J., Tai, T. H., Colowit, P., Greene, E. A., Henikoff, S., & Comai, L. (2007). Discovery of chemically induced mutations in rice by TILLING. BMC Plant Biology. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-7-19
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.