The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Severe strongyloidiasis: a systematic review of case reports
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Strongyloidiasis is commonly a clinically unapparent, chronic infection, but immuno suppressed subjects can develop fatal disease. We carried out a review of literature on hyperinfection syndrome (HS) and disseminated strongyloidiasis (DS), in order to describe the most challenging aspects of severe strongyloidiasis. METHODS: We conducted a structured search using PubMed to collect case reports and short case series on HS/DS published from 1991 to 2011. We restricted search to papers in English, Spanish, Italian and French. Case reports were classified as HS/DS according to given definitions. RESULTS: Records screened were 821, and 311 were excluded through titles and abstract evaluation. Of 510 full-text articles assessed for eligibility, 213 were included in qualitative analysis. As some of them were short case series, eventually the number of cases analyzed was 244.Steroids represented the main trigger predisposing to HS and DS (67% cases): they were mostly administered to treat underlying conditions (e.g. lymphomas, rheumatic diseases). However, sometimes steroids were empirically prescribed to treat signs and symptoms caused by unsuspected/unrecognized strongyloidiasis. Diagnosis was obtained by microscopy examination in 100% cases, while serology was done in a few cases (6.5%). Only in 3/29 cases of solid organ/bone marrow transplantation there is mention of pre-transplant serological screening. Therapeutic regimens were different in terms of drugs selection and combination, administration route and duration. Similar fatality rate was observed between patients with DS (68.5%) and HS (60%). CONCLUSIONS: Proper screening (which must include serology) is mandatory in high - risk patients, for instance candidates to immunosuppressive medications, currently or previously living in endemic countries. In some cases, presumptive treatment might be justified. Ivermectin is the gold standard for treatment, although the optimal dosage is not clearly defined in case of HS/DS.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Infection Risk and Safety of Corticosteroid Use
Youssef, J., Novosad, S. A., & Winthrop, K. L. (2016) · Rheumatic Disease Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.rdc.2015.08.004 · Cited by 459
Strongyloides stercoralis: A Plea for Action
Bisoffi, Z., Buonfrate, D., Montresor, A., Requena-Méndez, A., Muñoz, J., Krolewiecki, A. J., Gotuzzo, E., Mena, M. A., Chiodini, P. L., Anselmi, M., et al. (2013) · PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases · doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0002214 · Cited by 313
Self-citationIvermectin versus albendazole or thiabendazole for Strongyloides stercoralis infection
Henriquez-Camacho, C., Gotuzzo, E., Echevarria, J., White Jr, A. C., Terashima, A., Samalvides, F., Pérez-Molina, J. A., & Plana, M. N. (2016) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007745.pub3 · Cited by 193
Metadata
- Authors
- Buonfrate, D., Requena-Mendez, A., Angheben, A., Muñoz, J., Gobbi, F., Van Den Ende, J., & Bisoffi, Z.
- Venue
- BMC Infectious Diseases
- Published
- 2013-02-08
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 78-78
- ISSN
- 1471-2334 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2018693734
- Cited by
- 376
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Severe strongyloidiasis: a systematic review of case reports. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2334-13-78
- The paper
- Buonfrate, D., Requena-Mendez, A., Angheben, A., Muñoz, J., Gobbi, F., Van Den Ende, J., & Bisoffi, Z. (2013). Severe strongyloidiasis: a systematic review of case reports. BMC Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-13-78
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.