The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What do we know about chronic kidney disease in India: first report of the Indian CKD registry
Open accessAbstract
Background: There are no national data on the magnitude and pattern of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in India. The Indian CKD Registry documents the demographics, etiological spectrum, practice patterns, variations and special characteristics. Methods: Data was collected for this cross-sectional study in a standardized format according to predetermined criteria. Of the 52,273 adult patients, 35.5%, 27.9%, 25.6% and 11% patients came from South, North, West and East zones respectively. Results: The mean age was 50.1 ± 14.6 years, with M:F ratio of 70:30. Patients from North Zone were younger and those from the East Zone older. Diabetic nephropathy was the commonest cause (31%), followed by CKD of undetermined etiology (16%), chronic glomerulonephritis (14%) and hypertensive nephrosclerosis (13%). About 48% cases presented in Stage V; they were younger than those in Stages III-IV. Diabetic nephropathy patients were older, more likely to present in earlier stages of CKD and had a higher frequency of males; whereas those with CKD of unexplained etiology were younger, had more females and more frequently presented in Stage V. Patients in lower income groups had more advanced CKD at presentation. Patients presenting to public sector hospitals were poorer, younger, and more frequently had CKD of unknown etiology. Conclusions: This report confirms the emergence of diabetic nephropathy as the pre-eminent cause in India. Patients with CKD of unknown etiology are younger, poorer and more likely to present with advanced CKD. There were some geographic variations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A New Equation to Estimate Glomerular Filtration Rate
Levey, A. S., Stevens, L. A., Schmid, C. H., Zhang, Y. (., Castro, A. F., Feldman, H. I., Kusek, J. W., Eggers, P., Van Lente, F., Greene, T., et al. (2009) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-150-9-200905050-00006 · Cited by 25,603
Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization
Go, A. S., Chertow, G. M., Fan, D., McCulloch, C. E., & Hsu, C.-Y. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa041031 · Cited by 11,369
Cited by
Chronic kidney disease: global dimension and perspectives
Jha, V., Garcia-Garcia, G., Iseki, K., Li, Z., Naicker, S., Plattner, B., Saran, R., Wang, A. Y.-M., & Yang, C.-W. (2013) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60687-x · Cited by 4,383
Self-citationGlobal epidemiology of end-stage kidney disease and disparities in kidney replacement therapy
Thurlow, J. S., Joshi, M., Yan, G., Norris, K. C., Agodoa, L. Y., Yuan, C. M., & Nee, R. (2021) · American Journal of Nephrology · doi:10.1159/000514550 · Cited by 855
Metadata
- Authors
- Rajapurkar, M. M., John, G. T., Kirpalani, A. L., Abraham, G., Agarwal, S. K., Almeida, A. F., Gang, S., Gupta, A., Modi, G., Pahari, D., Pisharody, R., Prakash, J., Raman, A., Rana, D. S., Sharma, R. K., Sahoo, R., Sakhuja, V., Tatapudi, R. R., & Jha, V.
- Venue
- BMC Nephrology
- Published
- 2012-03-06
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 10-10
- ISSN
- 1471-2369 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2060452106
- Cited by
- 453
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What do we know about chronic kidney disease in India: first report of the Indian CKD registry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2369-13-10
- The paper
- Rajapurkar, M. M., John, G. T., Kirpalani, A. L., Abraham, G., Agarwal, S. K., Almeida, A. F., Gang, S., Gupta, A., Modi, G., Pahari, D., Pisharody, R., Prakash, J., Raman, A., Rana, D. S., Sharma, R. K., Sahoo, R., Sakhuja, V., Tatapudi, R. R., & Jha, V. (2012). What do we know about chronic kidney disease in India: first report of the Indian CKD registry. BMC Nephrology. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2369-13-10
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.