The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The influence of women’s preferences and actual mode of delivery on post-traumatic stress symptoms following childbirth: a population-based, longitudinal study
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to examine whether a mismatch between a woman's preferred and actual mode of delivery increases the risk of post-traumatic stress symptoms after childbirth. METHODS: The study sample consisted of 1,700 women scheduled to give birth between 2009 and 2010 at Akershus University Hospital, Norway. Questionnaire data from pregnancy weeks 17 and 32 and from 8 weeks postpartum were used along with data obtained from hospital birth records. Post-traumatic stress symptoms were measured with the Impact of Event Scale. Based on the women's preferred and actual mode of delivery, four groups were established: Match 1 (no preference for cesarean section, no elective cesarean section, N = 1,493); Match 2 (preference for cesarean section, elective cesarean section, N = 53); Mismatch 1 (no preference for cesarean section, elective cesarean section, N = 42); and Mismatch 2 (preference for cesarean section, no elective cesarean section, N = 112). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) were conducted to examine whether the level of post-traumatic stress symptoms differed significantly among these four groups. RESULTS: Examining differences for all four groups, ANOVA yielded significant overall group differences (F = 11.96, p < 0.001). However, Bonferroni post-hoc tests found significantly higher levels of post-traumatic stress symptoms only in Mismatch 2 compared to Match 1. This difference could be partly explained by a number of risk factors, particularly psychological risk factors such as fear of childbirth, depression, and anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest increased post-traumatic stress symptoms in women who preferred delivery by cesarean section but delivered vaginally compared to women who both preferred vaginal delivery and delivered vaginally. In psychologically vulnerable women, such mismatch may threaten their physical integrity and, in turn, result in post-traumatic stress symptoms. These women, who often fear childbirth, may prefer a cesarean section even though vaginal delivery is usually the best option in the absence of medical indications. To avoid potential trauma, fear of childbirth and maternal requests for a cesarean section should be taken seriously and responded to adequately.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Worldwide, self‐requested CB (sCB) and EA are strongly associated with a fear of childbirth (FOC), 1 , 17 , 18 and a fear of pain. 4 , 5”
From Fear of childbirth, nonurgent obstetric interventions, and newborn outcomes: A randomized controlled trial comparing mindfulness‐based childbirth and parenting with enhanced care as usual. (2022) · cites this paper as [18]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Untreated FOC is a risk factor for traumatic childbirth, 18 , 21”
From Fear of childbirth, nonurgent obstetric interventions, and newborn outcomes: A randomized controlled trial comparing mindfulness‐based childbirth and parenting with enhanced care as usual. (2022) · cites this paper as [18]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1998) · The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry · Cited by 19,139
Detection of Postnatal Depression: Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale
Cox, J. L., Holden, J. M., & Sagovsky, R. (1987) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.150.6.782 · Cited by 14,183
(1998) · PubMed · Cited by 10,216
Impact of Event Scale: A Measure of Subjective Stress
Horowitz, M., Wilner, N., & Alvarez, W. (1979) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00006842-197905000-00004 · Cited by 7,813
The mini international neuropsychiatric interview
Lecrubier, Y., Sheehan, D. V., Hergueta, T., & Weiller, E. (1998) · European Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0924-9338(99)80239-9 · Cited by 5,899
(1999) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,151
Personality Psychology in Europe
Vera-Bermudez, J., Raad, D. B., de Vries, J., García, A. M. P., Sanchez-Elvita, A., & Heck, G. V. (1997) · University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) · Cited by 2,462
The Mini-IPIP Scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five Factors of Personality.
Donnellan, M. B., Oswald, F. L., Baird, B. M., & Lucas, R. E. (2006) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.192 · Cited by 2,442
Assessing for Abuse During Pregnancy
McFARLANE, J. M. (1992) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1992.03480230068030 · Cited by 1,060
Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates
Betrán, A. P., Merialdi, M., Lauer, J. A., Wang, B., Thomas, J., Look, P. V., & WAGNER, M. G. (2007) · Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00786.x · Cited by 1,045
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Lazarus RS: Stress and Emotion. 1999, New York: Springer Publishing Company
- Norwegian Institute of Public Health: Medical Birth Registry of Norway. 2013, Oslo, Norway: Norwegian Institute of Public Health
- En gledelig begivenhet: Om en sammenhengende svangerskaps-, fødsels- og barselomsorg. 2009, Oslo: Ministry of Health and Care Services, White paper no. 12 2008/2009
- National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: Caesarean section. NICE clinical guideline 132. 2011
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–120 of 120
Cesarean Delivery and Mental Health
Antoniou, E., Orovou, E., Papatrechas, A., Arampatzi, C., & Eskitzis, P. (2022) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.108847
Oxytocin Abuse and Postpartum Hemorrhage
Abdelmounaim, L. G., Khouchoua, M., Nhiri, N., Biougnache, N., Rhaidouni, M. A., Laouji, O., Hadraoui, F. E., Rabbi, S. H., Ayoubi, O. E., Alaoui, O., et al. (2022) · Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.4236/ojog.2022.1212116
Hadid, S., Tomsis, Y., Perez, E., Sharabi, L., Shaked, M., & Haze, S. (2023) · Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology · doi:10.1080/02646838.2023.2187357 · Cited by 1
Eitenmüller, P., Fiesel, A. M., Köhler, S., von Blanckenburg, P., & Christiansen, H. (2024) · Journal of Affective Disorders Reports · doi:10.1016/j.jadr.2024.100861 · Cited by 1
Jarašiūnaitė–Fedosejeva, G., Stankevičienė, V., & Riklikienė, O. (2025) · Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology · doi:10.1080/02646838.2025.2591371
Predictors of caesarean intent and effect of unmet health conditions: evidence from Kerala, India
Philip, P. J., & Panda, G. R. (2025) · Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology · doi:10.1080/02646838.2025.2599244
Miller, Y. D., & Danoy-Monet, M. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14870683
Miller, Y. D., & Danoy-Monet, M. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14870674
Webb, R., Ayers, S., Bogaerts, A., Jeličić, L., Pawlicka, P., Haeken, S. V., Uddin, N., Xuereb, R. B., & Kolesnikova, N. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14903817
Mortazavi, F., & Mehrabadi, M. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14462844
Miller, Y. D., & Danoy-Monet, M. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14870677
Miller, Y. D., & Danoy-Monet, M. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14870686
Miller, Y. D., & Danoy-Monet, M. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14870671
Miller, Y. D., & Danoy-Monet, M. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14870689
Miller, Y. D., & Danoy-Monet, M. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14870680
Risk factors associated with fear of childbirth among pregnant women
Šegľová, S., Škodová, Z., & Bašková, M. (2026) · Kontakt · doi:10.32725/kont.2026.031
"Gold standard" Birth: Unmet birth expectations and the ought-maternal-self.
Matthews, R., Harman, V., & Finlay, K. (2026) · Social Science & Medicine (1967) · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119448
Mode of delivery in women with versus without psychiatric vulnerability
Holtrop, J., ten Buuren, A. A. A., Schonewille, N. N., Broeks, C. W., van Pampus, M. G., & Broekman, B. F. P. (2026) · Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1080/0167482x.2026.2699108
Parental Anxiety Trajectories 2 Years After NICU Discharge
Span, L. C., van Dokkum, N. H., ter Horst, H. J., Kooi, E. M. W., & Bos, A. F. (2026) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2025-074834
Akwa, G., Tiemah, N. C., Chabeja, A., Buh, F. C., & Kantaris, M. (2026) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.115806
Metadata
- Authors
- Garthus-Niegel, S., von Soest, T., Knoph, C., Simonsen, T. B., Torgersen, L., & Eberhard-Gran, M.
- Affiliations
- Akershus University Hospital (NO)
- Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NO)
- Venue
- BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
- Published
- 2014-06-05
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 191-191
- ISSN
- 1471-2393 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4053555
- OpenAlex
- W1999842561
- Cited by
- 120
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 6.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)) (submittedVersion)
- NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Norges Forskningsråd (191098)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy-related medical research
- Keywords
- posttraumatic stress symptoms, childbirth, mode of delivery, cesarean section, vaginal delivery, maternal preferences, fear of childbirth, depression, anxiety, psychological risk factors, postpartum period
- MeSH terms
- Neuroticism, Adolescent, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Cesarean Section, Depression, Fear, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Middle Aged, Norway, Pregnancy, Prospective Studies, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Elective Surgical Procedures, Parturition, Young Adult, Patient Preference
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review