The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A systematic review of maternal obesity and breastfeeding intention, initiation and duration
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Breastfeeding behaviour is multifactorial, and a wide range of socio-cultural and physiological variables impact on a woman's decision and ability to breastfeed successfully. An association has been reported between maternal obesity and low breastfeeding rates. This is of public health concern because obesity is rising in women of reproductive age and the apparent association with increased artificial feeding will lead to a greater risk of obesity in children. The aim of this paper is to examine the relationship between maternal overweight and obesity and breastfeeding intention and initiation and duration. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in January and February 2007, using the following databases: Medline, CINAHL and the Australian Breastfeeding Association's Lactation Resource Centre. Studies which have examined maternal obesity and infant feeding intention, initiation, duration and delayed onset of lactation were tabulated and summarised. RESULTS: Studies have found that obese women plan to breastfeed for a shorter period than normal weight women and are less likely to initiate breastfeeding. Of the four studies that examined onset of lactation, three reported a significant relationship between obesity and delayed lactogenesis. Fifteen studies, conducted in the USA, Australia, Denmark, Kuwait and Russia, have examined maternal obesity and duration of breastfeeding. The majority of large studies found that obese women breastfed for a shorter duration than normal weight women, even after adjusting for possible confounding factors. CONCLUSION: There is evidence from epidemiological studies that overweight and obese women are less likely to breastfeed than normal weight women. The reasons may be biological or they may be psychological, behavioral and/or cultural. We urgently need qualitative studies from women's perspective to help us understand women in this situation and their infant feeding decisions and behaviour.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2000) · PubMed · Cited by 13,173
Physical Status: The Use and Interpretation of Anthropometry
Frisancho, A. R. (1996) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/64.5.830 · Cited by 6,579
Maternal obesity and pregnancy outcome: a study of 287 213 pregnancies in London
Sebire, N., Jolly, M., Harris, J., Wadsworth, J., Joffe, M., Beard, R., Regan, L., & Robinson, S. (2001) · International Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0801670 · Cited by 1,743
Kramer, M. S., Chalmers, B., Hodnett, E. D., Sevkovskaya, Z., Dzikovich, I., Shapiro, S., Collet, J.-P., Vanilovich, I., Mezen, I., Ducruet, T., et al. (2001) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.285.4.413 · Cited by 1,534
Owen, C. G., Martin, R. M., Whincup, P. H., Smith, G. D., & Cook, D. G. (2005) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2004-1176 · Cited by 1,168
Duration of Breastfeeding and Risk of Overweight: A Meta-Analysis
Harder, T., Bergmann, R., Kallischnigg, G., & Plagemann, A. (2005) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwi222 · Cited by 1,161
Stunkard, A. J., Faith, M. S., & Allison, K. C. (2003) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0006-3223(03)00608-5 · Cited by 821
Dewey, K. G., Nommsen-Rivers, L. A., Heinig, M. J., & Cohen, R. J. (2003) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.112.3.607 · Cited by 748
The prevalence and impact of overweight and obesity in an Australian obstetric population
Callaway, L. K., Chang, A. M., McIntyre, H. D., & Prins, J. B. (2006) · Medical Journal of Australia · doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00115.x · Cited by 634
Obesity: Responding to the global epidemic.
Wadden, T. A., Brownell, K. D., & Foster, G. D. (2002) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-006x.70.3.510 · Cited by 599
Cited by
Why invest, and what it will take to improve breastfeeding practices?
Rollins, N. C., Bhandari, N., Hajeebhoy, N., Horton, S., Lutter, C. K., Martines, J. C., Piwoz, E. G., Richter, L. M., & Victora, C. G. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)01044-2 · Cited by 2,944
Preconceptional and maternal obesity: epidemiology and health consequences
Poston, L., Caleyachetty, R., Cnattingius, S., Corvalán, C., Uauy, R., Herring, S., & Gillman, M. W. (2016) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(16)30217-0 · Cited by 1,111
Risks associated with obesity in pregnancy, for the mother and baby: a systematic review of reviews
Marchi, J., Berg, M., Dencker, A., Olander, E. K., & Begley, C. (2015) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/obr.12288 · Cited by 991
Early‐life determinants of overweight and obesity: a review of systematic reviews
Monasta, L., Batty, G. D., Cattaneo, A., Lutje, V., Ronfani, L., Van Lenthe, F. J., & Brug, J. (2010) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1467-789x.2010.00735.x · Cited by 607
Breastfeeding and health outcomes for the mother-infant dyad
Dieterich, C. M., Felice, J. P., O’Sullivan, E., & Rasmussen, K. M. (2013) · Pediatric Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.pcl.2012.09.010 · Cited by 563
Metadata
- Authors
- Amir, L. H., & Donath, S.
- Venue
- BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
- Published
- 2007-07-04
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 9-9
- ISSN
- 1471-2393 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2107734673
- Cited by
- 521
- References
- 69
- FWCI
- 1.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A systematic review of maternal obesity and breastfeeding intention, initiation and duration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2393-7-9
- The paper
- Amir, L. H., & Donath, S. (2007). A systematic review of maternal obesity and breastfeeding intention, initiation and duration. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-7-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.