Cited by 23Psychiatric care and mental health servicesPatient Dignity and PrivacyMental Health Treatment and Access

Perceived humiliation during admission to a psychiatric emergency service and its relation to socio-demography and psychopathology

Open access
Svindseth, Marit F, Nøttestad, Jim A, Dahl, Alv A·2013·BMC Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of empirical studies of patients' level of humiliation during the hospital admission process and its implications for the clinical setting. We wanted to explore associations between self-rated humiliation and socio-demography and psychopathology in relation to admission to a psychiatric emergency unit. METHODS: Consecutively admitted patients (N = 186) were interviewed with several validated instruments. The patients self-rated humiliation by The Cantril Ladder, and 35% of the sample was defined as the high humiliation group. RESULTS: Final multivariate analysis found significant associations between compulsory admission, not being in paid work, high scores on hostility, and on entitlement, and high levels of humiliation. No significant interactions were observed between these variables, and the narcissism score was not a confounder concerning humiliation. CONCLUSIONS: High level of humiliation during the admission process was mainly related to patient factors, but also to compulsory admission which should be avoided as much as possible protecting the self-esteem of the patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-244x-13-217

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Four studies found no negative effect on patient satisfaction or dignity.

    “However, four studies found no negative effect on patient satisfaction or dignity (112–114).”

    From The benefits and harms of inpatient involuntary psychiatric treatment: a scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [113]

    The Results and Conclusion (page unavailable) report that high perceived humiliation was associated with compulsory admission, contrary to the attributed finding of no negative effect on dignity. The paper does not report patient satisfaction as an outcome or establish a finding across four studies. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 23

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hedlund JL Vieweg BW The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS): a comprehensive review J Operat Psychiatry 1980 11 48 65

Authors
Svindseth, M. F., Nøttestad, J. A., & Dahl, A. A.
Affiliations
  • St Olav's University Hospital (NO)
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
Corresponding author
Svindseth, Marit F
Venue
BMC Psychiatry
Published
2013-08-29
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
217-217
ISSN
1471-244X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2057464829
Cited by
23
References
29
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4
FWCI
2.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Patient Dignity and Privacy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
humiliation, psychiatric emergency admission, involuntary admission, sociodemographic factors, psychopathology, hostility, entitlement, narcissism, self-esteem, Cantril Ladder, mental health service users
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Commitment of Persons with Psychiatric Disorders, Emergency Services, Psychiatric, Emotions, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Perception, Social Stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review