Cited by 65Psychometric Methodologies and TestingAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Testing and Assessment

Computerized adaptive measurement of depression: A simulation study

Open access
Gardner, William, Shear, Katherine, Kelleher, Kelly J, Pajer, Kathleen A, Mammen, Oommen, Buysse, Daniel, Frank, Ellen·2004·BMC Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Efficient, accurate instruments for measuring depression are increasingly important in clinical practice. We developed a computerized adaptive version of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). We examined its efficiency and its usefulness in identifying Major Depressive Episodes (MDE) and in measuring depression severity. METHODS: Subjects were 744 participants in research studies in which each subject completed both the BDI and the SCID. In addition, 285 patients completed the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. RESULTS: The adaptive BDI had an AUC as an indicator of a SCID diagnosis of MDE of 88%, equivalent to the full BDI. The adaptive BDI asked fewer questions than the full BDI (5.6 versus 21 items). The adaptive latent depression score correlated r =.92 with the BDI total score and the latent depression score correlated more highly with the Hamilton (r =.74) than the BDI total score did (r =.70). CONCLUSIONS: Adaptive testing for depression may provide greatly increased efficiency without loss of accuracy in identifying MDE or in measuring depression severity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-244x-4-13

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adaptive testing techniques have been shown to reduce the number of necessary items to almost a quarter of that needed in paper versions of questionnaires without any loss of accuracy.

    “These “adaptive testing techniques” have been shown to reduce the number of necessary items to almost a quarter of that needed in paper versions of questionnaires [42] without any loss of accuracy.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 55 · Cited by 65

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. First MB Spitzer RL Gibbon M Williams JBW Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I) 1997 Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Press

Authors
Gardner, W., Shear, K., Kelleher, K. J., Pajer, K. A., Mammen, O., Buysse, D., & Frank, E.
Affiliations
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Gardner, William
Venue
BMC Psychiatry
Published
2004-05-06
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
13-13
ISSN
1471-244X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2125153636
Cited by
65
References
55
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • The Knowledge Bank (The Ohio State University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r24mh053817-05)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH 29618, R24MH056848, MH53817, R01MH029618, P30MH030915, MH56848, R37MH029618, MH30915)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
computerized adaptive testing, depression measurement, Beck Depression Inventory, major depressive episode, depression severity, diagnostic accuracy, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, severe combined immunodeficiency
MeSH terms
Adult, Algorithms, Computer Simulation, Depressive Disorder, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Personality Inventory, Pilot Projects, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Severity of Illness Index, Software, Prevalence, Patient Selection, Area Under Curve, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review