Cited by 451Sleep and related disordersHealth disparities and outcomesPublic Health and Social Inequalities

‘Sleep disparity’ in the population: poor sleep quality is strongly associated with poverty and ethnicity

Open access
Patel, Nirav P, Grandner, Michael A, Xie, Dawei, Branas, Charles C, Gooneratne, Nalaka·2010·BMC Public Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the social determinants of sleep attainment. This study examines the relationship of race/ethnicity, socio-economic status (SES) and other factors upon sleep quality. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of 9,714 randomly selected subjects was used to explore sleep quality obtained by self-report, in relation to socioeconomic factors including poverty, employment status, and education level. The primary outcome was poor sleep quality. Data were collected by the Philadelphia Health Management Corporation. RESULTS: Significant differences were observed in the outcome for race/ethnicity (African-American and Latino versus White: unadjusted OR = 1.59, 95% CI 1.24-2.05 and OR = 1.65, 95% CI 1.37-1.98, respectively) and income (below poverty threshold, unadjusted OR = 2.84, 95%CI 2.41-3.35). In multivariable modeling, health indicators significantly influenced sleep quality most prominently in poor individuals. After adjusting for socioeconomic factors (education, employment) and health indicators, the association of income and poor sleep quality diminished, but still persisted in poor Whites while it was no longer significant in poor African-Americans (adjusted OR = 1.95, 95% CI 1.47-2.58 versus OR = 1.16, 95% CI 0.87-1.54, respectively). Post-college education (adjusted OR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.31-0.71) protected against poor sleep. CONCLUSIONS: A "sleep disparity" exists in the study population: poor sleep quality is strongly associated with poverty and race. Factors such as employment, education and health status, amongst others, significantly mediated this effect only in poor subjects, suggesting a differential vulnerability to these factors in poor relative to non-poor individuals in the context of sleep quality. Consideration of this could help optimize targeted interventions in certain groups and subsequently reduce the adverse societal effects of poor sleep.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2458-10-475

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 56 · Cited by 451

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Philadelphia Health Management Corporation Community Health Database Book Community Health Database 2006 (Editor ed.^eds.). City: Author
  2. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Results from the 2001 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse: Volume I. Summary of National Findings Book Results from the 2001 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse: Volume I. Summary of National Findings 2002 (Editor ed.^eds.), Series H-17 edition. City
  3. Kalton G Flores-Cervantes I Weighting methods Journal of Official Statistics 2003 19 81 97
  4. U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey Book American Community Survey 2006 (Editor ed.^eds.). City: Author

Authors
Patel, N. P., Grandner, M. A., Xie, D., Branas, C. C., & Gooneratne, N.
Affiliations
  • Reading Hospital (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Grandner, Michael A
Venue
BMC Public Health
Published
2010-08-11
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
475-475
ISSN
1471-2458 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2017490739
Cited by
451
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 15
FWCI
13.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ScholarlyCommons (University of Pennsylvania) (submittedVersion)
  • Scholarly Commons (University of Pennsylvania) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (K23AG001021)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (T32HL007713)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
Keywords
sleep quality, poverty, socioeconomic status, race and ethnicity, African Americans, Hispanic Americans, income, educational attainment, employment status, health status
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Black or African American, Cross-Sectional Studies, Educational Status, Employment, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pennsylvania, Poverty, Sleep Deprivation, Black People, White People, Health Status Disparities, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review