Cited by 154Physical Activity and HealthObesity, Physical Activity, DietObesity and Health Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Football Fans in Training: the development and optimization of an intervention delivered through professional sports clubs to help men lose weight, become more active and adopt healthier eating habits

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of obesity in men is rising, but they are less likely than women to engage in existing weight management programmes. The potential of professional sports club settings to engage men in health promotion activities is being increasingly recognised. This paper describes the development and optimization of the Football Fans in Training (FFIT) programme, which aims to help overweight men (many of them football supporters) lose weight through becoming more active and adopting healthier eating habits. METHODS: The MRC Framework for the design and evaluation of complex interventions was used to guide programme development in two phases. In Phase 1, a multidisciplinary working group developed the pilot programme (p-FFIT) and used a scoping review to summarize previous research and identify the target population. Phase 2 involved a process evaluation of p-FFIT in 11 Scottish Premier League (SPL) clubs. Participant and coach feedback, focus group discussions and interviews explored the utility/acceptability of programme components and suggestions for changes. Programme session observations identified examples of good practice and problems/issues with delivery. Together, these findings informed redevelopment of the optimized programme (FFIT), whose components were mapped onto specific behaviour change techniques using an evidence-based taxonomy. RESULTS: p-FFIT comprised 12, weekly, gender-sensitised, group-based weight management classroom and 'pitch-side' physical activity sessions. These in-stadia sessions were complemented by an incremental, pedometer-based walking programme. p-FFIT was targeted at men aged 35-65 years with body mass index ≥ 27 kg/m(2). Phase 2 demonstrated that participants in p-FFIT were enthusiastic about both the classroom and physical activity components, and valued the camaraderie and peer-support offered by the programme. Coaches appreciated the simplicity of the key healthy eating and physical activity messages. Suggestions for improvements that were incorporated into the optimized FFIT programme included: more varied in-stadia physical activity with football-related components; post-programme weight management support (emails and a reunion session); and additional training for coaches in SMART goal setting and the pedometer-based walking programme. CONCLUSIONS: The Football Fans in Training programme is highly acceptable to participants and SPL coaches, and is appropriate for evaluation in a randomised controlled trial.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2458-13-232

Cites

61 of 62 references verified1 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Overview of FFIT programme development and optimization.
Figure 1 Overview of FFIT programme development and optimization.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 60 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Government Office for Science: Foresight tackling obesities: future choices - project report 2nd edition. 2007, London: Department of Innovation Universities and Skills
  2. Cancer Research UK: Obesity and diet. 2005, Cancer Research UK, http://info.cancerresearchuk.org/publicpolicy/ourpolicypositions/prevention/obesity/index.htm ,
  3. Government S: Scottish Health Survey 2010. 2011, Scottish Government: Edinburgh
  4. Daniel K: Brilliantly tackled. Community Pract. 2000, 73: 708-709.
  5. Witty K, White A: Tackling men’s health: implementation of a male health service in a rugby stadium setting. Community Pract. 2011, 84: 29-32.
  6. Scottish Premier League: SPL Trust. 2011, Scottish Premier League, http://www.scotprem.com/content/default.asp?page=home_Social%20Responsibility ,
  7. Cancer Research UK: UK, Weight Concern. Ten Top Tips: weight loss tips based on scientific evidence. 2010, Cancer Research UK, http://info.cancerresearchuk.org/healthyliving/obesityandweight/tentoptips/ ,
  8. Scottish Government: Active Nation: a Games legacy for Scotland. 2012, Scottish Government, http://www.ouractivenation.co.uk ,
  9. Abraham C: WIDER Recommendations to Improve Reporting of the Content of Behaviour Change Interventions. Abraham et al. 2009, http://interventiondesign.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/wider-recommendations.pdf ,

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–154 of 154

Metadata

Authors
Gray, C. M., Hunt, K., Mutrie, N., Anderson, A. S., Leishman, J., Dalgarno, L., & Wyke, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
  • MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit (GB)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • University of Dundee (GB)
  • NHS Forth Valley (GB)
Corresponding author
Gray, Cindy M
Venue
BMC Public Health
Published
2013-03-16
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
232-232
ISSN
1471-2458 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2134253157
Cited by
154
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 3
FWCI
8.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (09/3010/06)
  • University of Stirling
  • Medical Research Council (5TK50)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity and Health Practices
Keywords
football fans, weight loss, physical activity, healthy eating, professional football clubs, complex intervention development, behaviour change techniques, peer support, coach education, SMART goal setting, overweight men
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Feeding Behavior, Football, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Public Facilities, Program Evaluation, Program Development, Overweight, Weight Reduction Programs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review