Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 207

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sentinel surveillance for human enterovirus 71 in Sarawak, Malaysia: lessons from the first 7 years

Open access
Podin, Yuwana, Gias, Edna LM, Ong, Flora, Leong, Yee-Wei, Yee, Siew-Fung, Yusof, Mohd Apandi, Perera, David, Teo, Bibiana, Wee, Thian-Yew, Yao, Sik-Chi, Yao, Sik-King, Kiyu, Andrew, Arif, Mohd Taha, Cardosa, Mary Jane·2006·BMC Public Health

Abstract

Background: A major outbreak of human enterovirus 71-associated hand, foot and mouth disease in Sarawak in 1997 marked the beginning of a series of outbreaks in the Asia Pacific region. Some of these outbreaks had unusually high numbers of fatalities and this generated much fear and anxiety in the region. Methods: We established a sentinel surveillance programme for hand, foot and mouth disease in Sarawak, Malaysia, in March 1998, and the observations of the first 7 years are described here. Virus isolation, serotyping and genotyping were performed on throat, rectal, vesicle and other swabs. Results: During this period Sarawak had two outbreaks of human enterovirus 71, in 2000 and 2003. The predominant strains circulating in the outbreaks of 1997, 2000 and 2003 were all from genogroup B, but the strains isolated during each outbreak were genetically distinct from each other. Human enterovirus 71 outbreaks occurred in a cyclical pattern every three years and Coxsackievirus A16 co-circulated with human enterovirus 71. Although vesicles were most likely to yield an isolate, this sample was not generally available from most cases and obtaining throat swabs was thus found to be the most efficient way to obtain virological information. Conclusion: Knowledge of the epidemiology of human enterovirus 71 transmission will allow public health personnel to predict when outbreaks might occur and to plan interventions in an effective manner in order to reduce the burden of disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2458-6-180

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 207

Metadata

Authors
Podin, Y., Gias, E. L., Ong, F., Leong, Y.-W., Yee, S.-F., Yusof, M. A., Perera, D., Teo, B., Wee, T.-Y., Yao, S.-C., Yao, S.-K., Kiyu, A., Arif, M. T., & Cardosa, M. J.
Venue
BMC Public Health
Published
2006-07-07
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
180-180
ISSN
1471-2458 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2153710955
Cited by
207
References
1
FWCI
3.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sentinel surveillance for human enterovirus 71 in Sarawak, Malaysia: lessons from the first 7 years. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2458-6-180
The paper
Podin, Y., Gias, E. L., Ong, F., Leong, Y.-W., Yee, S.-F., Yusof, M. A., Perera, D., Teo, B., Wee, T.-Y., Yao, S.-C., Yao, S.-K., Kiyu, A., Arif, M. T., & Cardosa, M. J. (2006). Sentinel surveillance for human enterovirus 71 in Sarawak, Malaysia: lessons from the first 7 years. BMC Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-6-180

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.