The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Normative data and discriminative properties of short form 36 (SF-36) in Turkish urban population
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: SF-36 has been both translated into different languages and adapted to different cultures to obtain comparable data on health status internationally. However there have been only a limited number of studies focused on the discriminative ability of SF-36 regarding social and disease status in developing countries. The aim of this study was to obtain population norms of the short form 36 (SF-36) health survey and the association of SF-36 domains with demographic and socioeconomic variables in an urban population in Turkey. METHODS: A cross-sectional study. Face to face interviews were carried out with a sample of households. The sample was systematically selected from two urban Health Districts in Izmir, Turkey. The study group consisted of 1,279 people selected from a study population of 46,290 people aged 18 and over. RESULTS: Internal consistencies of the scales were high, with the exception of mental health and vitality. Physical health scales were associated with both age and gender. On the other hand, mental health scales were less strongly associated with age and gender. Women reported poorer health compared to men in general. Social risk factors (employment status, lower education and economic strain) were associated with worse health profiles. The SF-36 was found to be capable of discriminating disease status. CONCLUSION: Our findings, cautiously generalisable to urban population, suggest that the SF-36 can be a valuable tool for studies on health outcomes in Turkish population. SF-36 may also be a promising measure for research on health inequalities in Turkey and other developing countries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Herne, H., Cooley, W. W., & Lohnes, P. R. (1973) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2344428 · Cited by 35,697
(1992) · PubMed · Cited by 33,716
The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual Framework and Item Selection
Ware, J. E., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002 · Cited by 30,033
O'fallon, W. M. (1973) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1973.10489095 · Cited by 6,289
Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care.
Brazier, J. E., Harper, R., Jones, N. M., O'Cathain, A., Thomas, K. J., Usherwood, T., & Westlake, L. (1992) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.305.6846.160 · Cited by 4,653
(1994) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,156
Cross-Validation of Item Selection and Scoring for the SF-12 Health Survey in Nine Countries
Gandek, B., Ware, J. E., Aaronson, N. K., Apolone, G., Bjorner, J. B., Brazier, J. E., Bullinger, M., Kaasa, S., Leplege, A., Prieto, L., et al. (1998) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00109-7 · Cited by 2,907
Overview of the SF-36 Health Survey and the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project
Ware, J. E., & Gandek, B. (1998) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00081-x · Cited by 2,605
The SF36 health survey questionnaire: an outcome measure suitable for routine use within the NHS?
Garratt, A. M., Ruta, D. A., Abdalla, M. I., Buckingham, J. K., & Russell, I. T. (1993) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.306.6890.1440 · Cited by 1,141
Translating Health Status Questionnaires and Evaluating Their Quality
Bullinger, M., Alonso, J., Apolone, G., Leplège, A., Sullivan, M., Wood-Dauphinee, S., Gandek, B., Wagner, A., Aaronson, N., Bech, P., et al. (1998) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00082-1 · Cited by 912
Cited by
Tulek, Z., Baykal, D., Erturk, S., Bilgic, B., Hanagasi, H., & Gurvit, I. H. (2020) · Issues in Mental Health Nursing · doi:10.1080/01612840.2019.1705945 · Cited by 76
Kalpaklioglu, A. F., & Kavut, A. B. (2009) · Journal of Asthma · doi:10.1080/02770900902849897 · Cited by 32
Quality of life and influencing factors of coal miners in Xuzhou, China
Han, L., Li, Y., Yan, W., Xie, L., Wang, S., Wu, Q., Ji, X., Zhu, B., & Ni, C. (2018) · Journal of Thoracic Disease · doi:10.21037/jtd.2018.01.14 · Cited by 26
Aklar, A., Bal, B., Taşdelen, N., İnal, H. S., & Ertaş, G. (2025) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm14082544 · Cited by 2
“…of 94.7 for physical functioning, 96.5 for social functioning, 95.3 for role limitation due to physical problems, 95.8 for role limitation due to emotional problems, 95.8 for mental health, 68.6 for energy and vitality, 90.1 for bodily pain, and 77.3 for the general perception of health [42].”
Influential
Metadata
- Authors
- Demiral, Y., Ergor, G., Unal, B., Semin, S., Akvardar, Y., Kıvırcık, B., & Alptekin, K.
- Venue
- BMC Public Health
- Published
- 2006-10-09
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 247-247
- ISSN
- 1471-2458 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1521568542
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 10.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Normative data and discriminative properties of short form 36 (SF-36) in Turkish urban population. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2458-6-247
- The paper
- Demiral, Y., Ergor, G., Unal, B., Semin, S., Akvardar, Y., Kıvırcık, B., & Alptekin, K. (2006). Normative data and discriminative properties of short form 36 (SF-36) in Turkish urban population. BMC Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-6-247
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.