CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 139Primary Care and Health OutcomesChronic Disease Management StrategiesEmergency and Acute Care Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Epidemiology of frequent attenders: a 3-year historic cohort study comparing attendance, morbidity and prescriptions of one-year and persistent frequent attenders

Open access
Smits, Frans ThM, Brouwer, Henk J, ter Riet, Gerben, van Weert, Henk CP·2009·BMC Public Health
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-9-36PMC PMC2649070
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: General Practitioners spend a disproportionate amount of time on frequent attenders. So far, trials on the effect of interventions on frequent attenders have shown negative results. However, these trials were conducted in short-term frequent attenders. It would be more reasonable to target intervention at persistent frequent attenders. Typical characteristics of persistent frequent attenders, as opposed to 1-year frequent attenders and non-frequent attenders, may generate hypotheses regarding modifiable factors on which new randomized trials may be designed. METHODS: We used the data of all 28,860 adult patients from 5 primary healthcare centers. Frequent attenders were patients whose attendance rate ranked in the (age and sex adjusted) top 10 percent during 1 year (1-year frequent attenders) or 3 years (persistent frequent attenders). All other patients on the register over the 3-year period were referred to as non-frequent attenders. The lists of medical problems coded by the GP using the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC) were used to assess morbidity.First, we determined which proportion of 1-year frequent attenders was still a frequent attender during the next two consecutive years and calculated the GPs' workload for these patients. Second, we compared morbidity and number of prescriptions for non-frequent attenders, 1-year frequent attenders and persistent frequent attenders. RESULTS: Of all 1-year frequent attenders, 15.4% became a persistent frequent attender equal to 1.6% of all patients. The 1-year frequent attenders (3,045; 10.6%) were responsible for 39% of the face-to-face consultations; the 470 patients who would become persistent frequent attenders (1.6%) were responsible for 8% of all consultations in 2003. Persistent frequent attenders presented more social problems, more psychiatric problems and medically unexplained physical symptoms, but also more chronic somatic diseases (especially diabetes). They received more prescriptions for psychotropic medication. CONCLUSION: One out of every seven 1-year-frequent attenders (15.4%) becomes a persistent frequent attender. Compared with non-frequent attenders, and 1-year frequent attenders, persistent frequent attenders consume more health care and are diagnosed not only with more somatic diseases but especially more social problems, psychiatric problems and medically unexplained physical symptoms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2458-9-36

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Flow diagram: Persistence of Frequent Attendance.
Figure 1 Flow diagram: Persistence of Frequent Attendance.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Carney TA, Guy S, Jeffrey G: Frequent attenders in general practice: a retrospective 20-year follow-up study. Br J Gen Pract. 2001, 51: 567-569.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–138 of 138

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Smits, F. T., Brouwer, H. J., ter Riet, G., & van Weert, H. C.
Affiliations
Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Smits, Frans ThM
ORCID
Smits, Frans ThM
Venue
BMC Public Health
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2009-01-24
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
36-36
ISSN
1471-2458 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1186/1471-2458-9-36
PMC
PMC2649070
OpenAlex
W1976363983
Cited by
139
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
FWCI
11.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • BMC Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
Universiteit van Amsterdam
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
Keywords
frequent attenders, general practitioner workload, morbidity, prescribing patterns, psychotropic drugs, medically unexplained physical symptoms, mental illness, social problems, chronic somatic diseases, diabetes mellitus, primary care utilization, International Classification of Primary Care
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Drug Utilization, Family Practice, Female, Health Services Misuse, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Morbidity, Netherlands, Office Visits, Physician-Patient Relations, Probability, Sensitivity and Specificity, Sex Factors, Cohort Studies, Incidence, Survival Analysis, Health Care Surveys, Prescriptions, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review