The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Healthcare workers' attitudes to working during pandemic influenza: a qualitative study
Open accessAbstract
Background: Healthcare workers (HCWs) will play a key role in any response to pandemic influenza, and the UK healthcare system's ability to cope during an influenza pandemic will depend, to a large extent, on the number of HCWs who are able and willing to work through the crisis. UK emergency planning will be improved if planners have a better understanding of the reasons UK HCWs may have for their absenteeism, and what might motivate them to work during an influenza pandemic. This paper reports the results of a qualitative study that explored UK HCWs' views (n = 64) about working during an influenza pandemic, in order to identify factors that might influence their willingness and ability to work and to identify potential sources of any perceived duty on HCWs to work. Methods: A qualitative study, using focus groups (n = 9) and interviews (n = 5). Results: HCWs across a range of roles and grades tended to feel motivated by a sense of obligation to work through an influenza pandemic. A number of significant barriers that may prevent them from doing so were also identified. Perceived barriers to the ability to work included being ill oneself, transport difficulties, and childcare responsibilities. Perceived barriers to the willingness to work included: prioritising the wellbeing of family members; a lack of trust in, and goodwill towards, the NHS; a lack of information about the risks and what is expected of them during the crisis; fear of litigation; and the feeling that employers do not take the needs of staff seriously. Barriers to ability and barriers to willingness, however, are difficult to separate out. Conclusion: Although our participants tended to feel a general obligation to work during an influenza pandemic, there are barriers to working, which, if generalisable, may significantly reduce the NHS workforce during a pandemic. The barriers identified are both barriers to willingness and to ability. This suggests that pandemic planning needs to take into account the possibility that staff may be absent for reasons beyond those currently anticipated in UK planning documents. In particular, staff who are physically able to attend work may nonetheless be unwilling to do so. Although there are some barriers that cannot be mitigated by employers (such as illness, transport infrastructure etc.), there are a number of remedial steps that can be taken to lesson the impact of others (providing accommodation, building reciprocity, provision of information and guidance etc). We suggest that barriers to working lie along an ability/willingness continuum, and that absenteeism may be reduced by taking steps to prevent barriers to willingness becoming perceived barriers to ability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Exploring the impacts of COVID-19 on travel behavior and mode preferences
Abdullah, M., Dias, C., Muley, D., & Shahin, M. (2020) · Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives · doi:10.1016/j.trip.2020.100255 · Cited by 678
Goulia, P., Mantas, C., Dimitroula, D., Mantis, D., & Hyphantis, T. (2010) · BMC Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1186/1471-2334-10-322 · Cited by 438
Carrying Out Rapid Qualitative Research During a Pandemic: Emerging Lessons From COVID-19
Vindrola-Padros, C., Chisnall, G., Cooper, S., Dowrick, A., Djellouli, N., Symmons, S. M., Martin, S., Singleton, G., Vanderslott, S., Vera, N., et al. (2020) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732320951526 · Cited by 448
Taking control amidst the chaos: emotion regulation during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Restubog, S. L. D., Ocampo, A. C. G., & Wang, L. (2020) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103440 · Cited by 419
Psychological impact of the pandemic (H1N1) 2009 on general hospital workers in Kobe
Matsuishi, K., Kawazoe, A., Imai, H., Ito, A., Mouri, K., Kitamura, N., Miyake, K., Mino, K., Isobe, M., Takamiya, S., et al. (2012) · Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences · doi:10.1111/j.1440-1819.2012.02336.x · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- Ives, J., Greenfield, S., Parry, J. M., Draper, H., Gratus, C., Petts, J. I., Sorell, T., & Wilson, S.
- Venue
- BMC Public Health
- Published
- 2009-02-12
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 56-56
- ISSN
- 1471-2458 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1995708982
- Cited by
- 250
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Healthcare workers' attitudes to working during pandemic influenza: a qualitative study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2458-9-56
- The paper
- Ives, J., Greenfield, S., Parry, J. M., Draper, H., Gratus, C., Petts, J. I., Sorell, T., & Wilson, S. (2009). Healthcare workers' attitudes to working during pandemic influenza: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-56
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.