The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A comparison between two brine shrimp assays to detect in vitrocytotoxicity in marine natural products
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The brine shrimp lethality assay is considered a useful tool for preliminary assessment of toxicity. It has also been suggested for screening pharmacological activities in plant extracts. However, we think that it is necessary to evaluate the suitability of the brine shrimp methods before they are used as a general bio-assay to test natural marine products for pharmacological activity. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The bioactivity of the isopropanolic (2-PrOH) extracts of 14 species of marine invertebrates and 6 species of macroalgae was evaluated with the shrimp lethality assay (lethality assay), as well as with another assay based on the inhibition of hatching of the cyst (hatchability assay). The extracts were also assayed for cytotoxicity against two human cell lines, lung carcinoma A-549 and colon carcinoma HT-29, in order to assess the sensitivity of the shrimp assays to detect cytotoxic activity. RESULTS: Two sponges (Hyatella sp, Dysidea sp.), two gorgonians (Pacifigorgia adamsii, Muricea sp.), one tunicate (Polyclinum laxum), and three echinoderms (Holothuria impatiens, Pseudoconus californica and Pharia pyramidata) showed a strong cytostatic (growth inhibition) and cytotoxic effect. The hatchability assay showed a strong activity in 4 of the species active against the two human cell lines tested (Hyatella sp, Dysidea sp., Pacifigorgia adamsii and Muricea sp.), and the lethality assay also showed a high lethality in 4 of them (Pacifigorgia adamsii, Muricea sp., Polyclinum laxum, and Pharia pyramidata). Each bioassay detected activity in 50% of the species that were considered active against the two human cell lines tested. However, the simultaneous use of both bioassays increased the percentage to 75%. CONCLUSIONS: Our results seem consistent with the correlation previously established between cytotoxicity and brine shrimp lethality in plant extracts. We suggest using both bioassays simultaneously to test natural marine products for pharmacological activity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Uses and abuses of in vitro tests in ethnopharmacology: Visualizing an elephant
Houghton, P. J., Howes, M.-J., Lee, C. C., & Steventon, G. (2007) · Journal of Ethnopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.jep.2007.01.032 · Cited by 353
Toxicity of clove essential oil and its ester eugenyl acetate against Artemia salina
Cansian, R. L., Vanin, A. B., Orlando, T., Piazza, S. P., Puton, B. M. S., Cardoso, R. I., Gonçalves, I. L., Honaiser, T. C., Paroul, N., & Oliveira, D. (2017) · Brazilian Journal of Biology · doi:10.1590/1519-6984.12215 · Cited by 67
Ismail, T., Akhtar, S., Sestili, P., Riaz, M., Ismail, A., & Labbe, R. G. (2016) · Journal of Food Biochemistry · doi:10.1111/jfbc.12250 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Carballo, J. L., Hernández-Inda, Z. L., Pérez, P., & García-Grávalos, M. D.
- Venue
- BMC Biotechnology
- Published
- 2002-09-23
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-17
- ISSN
- 1472-6750 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1780651846
- Cited by
- 401
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comparison between two brine shrimp assays to detect in vitrocytotoxicity in marine natural products. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1472-6750-2-17
- The paper
- Carballo, J. L., Hernández-Inda, Z. L., Pérez, P., & García-Grávalos, M. D. (2002). A comparison between two brine shrimp assays to detect in vitrocytotoxicity in marine natural products. BMC Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-2-17
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.