The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mechanism of chimera formation during the Multiple Displacement Amplification reaction
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Multiple Displacement Amplification (MDA) is a method used for amplifying limiting DNA sources. The high molecular weight amplified DNA is ideal for DNA library construction. While this has enabled genomic sequencing from one or a few cells of unculturable microorganisms, the process is complicated by the tendency of MDA to generate chimeric DNA rearrangements in the amplified DNA. Determining the source of the DNA rearrangements would be an important step towards reducing or eliminating them. RESULTS: Here, we characterize the major types of chimeras formed by carrying out an MDA whole genome amplification from a single E. coli cell and sequencing by the 454 Life Sciences method. Analysis of 475 chimeras revealed the predominant reaction mechanisms that create the DNA rearrangements. The highly branched DNA synthesized in MDA can assume many alternative secondary structures. DNA strands extended on an initial template can be displaced becoming available to prime on a second template creating the chimeras. Evidence supports a model in which branch migration can displace 3'-ends freeing them to prime on the new templates. More than 85% of the resulting DNA rearrangements were inverted sequences with intervening deletions that the model predicts. Intramolecular rearrangements were favored, with displaced 3'-ends reannealing to single stranded 5'-strands contained within the same branched DNA molecule. In over 70% of the chimeric junctions, the 3' termini had initiated priming at complimentary sequences of 2-21 nucleotides (nts) in the new templates. CONCLUSION: Formation of chimeras is an important limitation to the MDA method, particularly for whole genome sequencing. Identification of the mechanism for chimera formation provides new insight into the MDA reaction and suggests methods to reduce chimeras. The 454 sequencing approach used here will provide a rapid method to assess the utility of reaction modifications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Genome Standards Consortium, Bowers, R. M., Kyrpides, N. C., Stepanauskas, R., Harmon-Smith, M., Doud, D., Reddy, T. B. K., Schulz, F., Jarett, J., Rivers, A. R., et al. (2017) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3893 · Cited by 2,624
Single-cell genome sequencing: current state of the science
Gawad, C., Koh, W., & Quake, S. R. (2016) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg.2015.16 · Cited by 1,334
Single-Neuron Sequencing Analysis of L1 Retrotransposition and Somatic Mutation in the Human Brain
Evrony, G. D., Cai, X., Lee, E., Hills, L. B., Elhosary, P. C., Lehmann, H. S., Parker, J. J., Atabay, K. D., Gilmore, E. C., Poduri, A., et al. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.09.035 · Cited by 548
Mosaic Copy Number Variation in Human Neurons
McConnell, M. J., Lindberg, M. R., Brennand, K. J., Piper, J. C., Voet, T., Cowing-Zitron, C., Shumilina, S., Lasken, R. S., Vermeesch, J. R., Hall, I. M., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1243472 · Cited by 551
Self-citationGoing viral: next-generation sequencing applied to phage populations in the human gut
Reyes, A., Semenkovich, N. P., Whiteson, K., Rohwer, F., & Gordon, J. I. (2012) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2853 · Cited by 441
Metadata
- Authors
- Lasken, R. S., & Stockwell, T. B.
- Venue
- BMC Biotechnology
- Published
- 2007
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 19
- ISSN
- 1472-6750 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1976927562
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanism of chimera formation during the Multiple Displacement Amplification reaction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1472-6750-7-19
- The paper
- Lasken, R. S., & Stockwell, T. B. (2007). Mechanism of chimera formation during the Multiple Displacement Amplification reaction. BMC Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-7-19
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.