The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An efficient one-step site-directed deletion, insertion, single and multiple-site plasmid mutagenesis protocol
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Mutagenesis plays an essential role in molecular biology and biochemistry. It has also been used in enzymology and protein science to generate proteins which are more tractable for biophysical techniques. The ability to quickly and specifically mutate a residue(s) in protein is important for mechanistic and functional studies. Although many site-directed mutagenesis methods have been developed, a simple, quick and multi-applicable method is still desirable. RESULTS: We have developed a site-directed plasmid mutagenesis protocol that preserved the simple one step procedure of the QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis but enhanced its efficiency and extended its capability for multi-site mutagenesis. This modified protocol used a new primer design that promoted primer-template annealing by eliminating primer dimerization and also permitted the newly synthesized DNA to be used as the template in subsequent amplification cycles. These two factors we believe are the main reasons for the enhanced amplification efficiency and for its applications in multi-site mutagenesis. CONCLUSION: Our modified protocol significantly increased the efficiency of single mutation and also allowed facile large single insertions, deletions/truncations and multiple mutations in a single experiment, an option incompatible with the standard QuikChange. Furthermore the new protocol required significantly less parental DNA which facilitated the DpnI digestion after the PCR amplification and enhanced the overall efficiency and reliability. Using our protocol, we generated single site, multiple single-site mutations and a combined insertion/deletion mutations. The results demonstrated that this new protocol imposed no additional reagent costs (beyond basic QuikChange) but increased the overall success rates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Structure and mechanism of the tRNA-dependent lantibiotic dehydratase NisB
Ortega, M. A., Hao, Y., Zhang, Q., Walker, M. C., van der Donk, W. A., & Nair, S. K. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13888 · Cited by 317
Structural basis of outer membrane protein insertion by the BAM complex
Gu, Y., Li, H., Dong, H., Zeng, Y., Zhang, Z., Paterson, N. G., Stansfeld, P. J., Wang, Z., Zhang, Y., Wang, W., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature17199 · Cited by 308
Structural identification of a hotspot on CFTR for potentiation
Liu, F., Zhang, Z., Levit, A., Levring, J., Touhara, K. K., Shoichet, B. K., & Chen, J. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaw7611 · Cited by 253
Mutation in ATG5 reduces autophagy and leads to ataxia with developmental delay
Kim, M., Sandford, E., Gatica, D., Qiu, Y., Liu, X., Zheng, Y., Schulman, B. A., Xu, J., Semple, I., Ro, S.-H., et al. (2016) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.12245 · Cited by 225
Bacterial retrons encode phage-defending tripartite toxin–antitoxin systems
Bobonis, J., Mitosch, K., Mateus, A., Karcher, N., Kritikos, G., Selkrig, J., Zietek, M., Monzon, V., Pfalz, B., Garcia-Santamarina, S., et al. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05091-4 · Cited by 165
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, H., & Naismith, J. H.
- Venue
- BMC Biotechnology
- Published
- 2008
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 91
- ISSN
- 1472-6750 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2030632688
- Cited by
- 1,214
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An efficient one-step site-directed deletion, insertion, single and multiple-site plasmid mutagenesis protocol. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1472-6750-8-91
- The paper
- Liu, H., & Naismith, J. H. (2008). An efficient one-step site-directed deletion, insertion, single and multiple-site plasmid mutagenesis protocol. BMC Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-8-91
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.