The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Detection and diagnosis of the early caries lesion
Open accessAbstract
The purpose of this manuscript is to discuss the current available methods to detect early lesions amenable to prevention. The current evidenced-based caries understanding, based on biological concepts, involves new approaches in caries detection, assessment, and management that should include non-cavitated lesions. Even though the importance of management of non-cavitated (NC) lesions has been recognized since the early 1900 s, dental caries has been traditionally detected at the cavitation stage, and its management has focused strongly on operative treatment. Methods of detection of early carious lesions have received significant research attention over the last 20 years. The most common method of caries detection is visual-tactile. Other non-invasive techniques for detection of early caries have been developed and investigated such as Quantitative Light-induced Fluorescence (QLF), DIAGNOdent (DD), Fibre-optic Transillumination (FOTI) and Electrical Conductance (EC). Based on previous systematic reviews, the diagnosis of NCCLs might be more accurately achieved in combination of the visual method and the use of other methods such as electrical methods and QLF for monitoring purposes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fleischmann (2008) · doi:10.2471/blt.00.000000 · Cited by 446
The effect of varying diagnostic thresholds upon clinical caries data for a low prevalence group
Pitts, N. B., & Fyffe, H. E. (1988) · Journal of Dental Research · doi:10.1177/00220345880670031401 · Cited by 184
Fyffe, H. E., Deery, C., Nugent, Z. J., Nuttall, N. M., & Pitts, N. B. (2000) · Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0528.2000.280106.x · Cited by 128
Cited by
The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Caries Detection: A Review
Al-Khalifa, K. S., Ahmed, W. M., Azhari, A. A., Qaw, M., Alsheikh, R., Alqudaihi, F., & Alfaraj, A. (2024) · Bioengineering · doi:10.3390/bioengineering11090936 · Cited by 48
Fakhruddin, K., & El Batawi, H. (2017) · Dental Research Journal · doi:10.4103/1735-3327.208768 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Gomez, J.
- Venue
- BMC Oral Health
- Published
- 2015-09-15
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- S3-S3
- ISSN
- 1472-6831 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1862977326
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 14.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.