The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The modified dental anxiety scale: UK general public population norms in 2008 with further psychometrics and effects of age
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS) is a brief, self-complete questionnaire consisting of five questions and summed together to produce a total score ranging from 5 to 25. It has reasonable psychometric properties, low instrumental effects and can be integrated into everyday dental practice as a clinical aid and screen for dental anxiety. The objectives were to (i) produce confirmatory evidence of reliability and validity for the MDAS, (ii) provide up-to-date UK representative norms for the general public to enable clinicians to compare their patients' scores, (iii) to determine the nature of the relationship between dental anxiety and age. METHODS: Telephone survey of a representative quota sample of 1000 UK adults (>18 years of age) conducted between 7-21 April, 2008. RESULTS: Attrition of potential participants was high in the recruitment process, although bias was minimal. Estimated proportion of participants with high dental anxiety (cut-off score = 19) was 11.6%. Dental anxiety was four times greater in the youngest age group (18-39 yrs) compared to older participants (60+ yrs), controlling for sex, social class and self-reported dental visiting behaviour confirming previous developed-world reports. CONCLUSION: The scale's psychometrics is supportive for the routine assessment of patient dental anxiety to compare against a number of major demographic groups categorised by age and sex. Dental anxiety was high in younger compared to older people.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In the main analysis the differences between groups at baseline was adjusted for various characteristics: baseline health- related quality of life (in the QALY equation), modified dental anxiety scale (MDAS) score [25], education level, Indices of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) quintile of the patients' home postcode (as per the published English indices of deprivation, 2019 (https:// www. gov. uk/ go”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research
Brown, T. A. (2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-2769 · Cited by 15,621
A Rationale and Test for the Number of Factors in Factor Analysis
Horn, J. L. (1965) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02289447 · Cited by 8,965
FACTOR: A computer program to fit the exploratory factor analysis model
Lorenzo‐Seva, U., & Ferrando, P. J. (2006) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/bf03192753 · Cited by 1,325
Development of a Dental Anxiety Scale
Corah, N. L. (1969) · Journal of Dental Research · doi:10.1177/00220345690480041801 · Cited by 1,299
Jacobson, A. (1988) · American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · doi:10.1016/0889-5406(88)90461-1 · Cited by 666
(1995) · PubMed · Cited by 614
Self-citationAdult Dental Health Survey.: Oral Health in the United Kingdom.
Kelly, M., Steele, J. R., Nuttall, N. M., Bradnock, G., Morris, J. H., Nunn, J., Pine, C. M., Pitts, N. B., Treasure, E. T., White, D. A., et al. (2000) · Cited by 448
ANXIETY AND PAIN MEASURES IN DENTISTRY: A GUIDE TO THEIR QUALITY AND APPLICATION
Newton, T., & Buck, D. (2000) · The Journal of the American Dental Association · doi:10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0056 · Cited by 276
Further evidence for the reliability and validity of the Modified Dental Anxiety Scale
Humphris, G. M., Freeman, R., Campbell, J., Tuutti, H., & D’Souza, V. (2000) · International Dental Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1875-595x.2000.tb00570.x · Cited by 267
Self-citationKleinknecht, R. A., & Bernstein, D. A. (1978) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(78)80138-5 · Cited by 256
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Arbuckle J: Amos 17 User's Guide. 17.0 version. 2008, Spring House: Amos Development Corporation
- Humphris GM, Morrison T, Lindsay SJE: The Modified Dental Anxiety Scale: UK norms and evidence for validity. Community Dental Health. 1995, 12: 143-150.
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Dental Statistics and Research Unit: Oral health and access to dental care – the gap between the "deprived" and the "priveleged" in Australia. 2001, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Dental Statistics and Research Unit, University of Adelaide
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Effects of lavender on anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Donelli, D., Antonelli, M., Bellinazzi, C., Gensini, G. F., & Firenzuoli, F. (2019) · Phytomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.phymed.2019.153099 · Cited by 231
A critical review of approaches to the treatment of dental anxiety in adults
Gordon, D., Heimberg, R. G., Tellez, M., & Ismail, A. I. (2013) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2013.04.002 · Cited by 168
The prevalence of dental anxiety across previous distressing experiences
Humphris, G. M., & King, K. (2010) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.09.007 · Cited by 149
Self-citationThe prevalence of dental anxiety and fear in patients referred to Isfahan Dental School, Iran.
Saatchi, M., Abtahi, M., Mohammadi, G., Mirdamadi, M., & Binandeh, E. S. (2015) · PubMed Central · Cited by 140
Humphris, G., Crawford, J. R., Hill, K., Gilbert, A., & Freeman, R. (2013) · BMC Oral Health · doi:10.1186/1472-6831-13-29 · Cited by 138
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Humphris, G. M., Dyer, T. A., & Robinson, P. G.
- Affiliations
- University of St Andrews (GB)
- University of Sheffield (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Humphris, Gerry M
- Venue
- BMC Oral Health
- Published
- 2009-08-26
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 20-20
- ISSN
- 1472-6831 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2743651
- OpenAlex
- W2024852213
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 6.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- BMC Oral Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- St Andrews Research Repository (St Andrews Research Repository) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › General Dentistry › Dental Health and Care Utilization
- Keywords
- Modified Dental Anxiety Scale, dental anxiety, psychometric validation, reference values, age differences, anxiety screening, questionnaire reliability and validity, general population, young adults, older adults
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
