The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Satisfaction and quality of life in women who undergo breast surgery: A qualitative study
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: In cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery, measurement of patient-reported outcomes has become increasingly important to research efforts and clinical care. We aimed to describe how breast conditions and breast surgery impact on patient satisfaction and quality of life. METHODS: We conducted qualitative, in-depth interviews with 48 women who had undergone either breast reduction (n = 15), breast augmentation (n = 12), or breast reconstruction (n = 21) surgery in order to begin to build a theoretical understanding of patient satisfaction and quality of life in breast surgery patients. Interviews were audio-taped, transcribed verbatim and analyzed thematically. RESULTS: The patient interviews revealed that breast conditions and breast surgery impact women in the following six main areas: satisfaction with breasts; satisfaction with overall outcome; psychosocial well-being; sexual well-being; physical well-being; and satisfaction with the process of care. We used these six themes to form the basis of a conceptual framework of patient satisfaction and quality of life in women who undergo breast surgery. CONCLUSION: Our conceptual framework establishes the main issues of concern for breast surgery patients. This new framework can be used to help develop local guidelines for future clinical assessment, management and measurement, establish the validity of the current management strategies, and develop evidence-based guidance for the development of new patient reported outcome measures for future outcomes research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Qualitative research in health care: Analysing qualitative data
Pope, C. (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7227.114 · Cited by 8,131
Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research
Morse, J. M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., & Spiers, J. (2002) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/160940690200100202 · Cited by 4,978
Gibbs, G. (2007) · doi:10.4135/9781849208574 · Cited by 4,299
Pope, C., & Mays, N. (1995) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.311.6996.42 · Cited by 2,336
Cited by
Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the FACE-Q Satisfaction with Appearance Scale
Pusic, A. L., Klassen, A. F., Scott, A. M., & Cano, S. J. (2013) · Clinics in Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.cps.2012.12.001 · Cited by 253
Self-citationBamber, L., Wang, M. Y., Prins, M. H., Ciniglio, C., Bauersachs, R., Lensing, A. W. A., & Cano, S. J. (2013) · Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1160/th13-03-0243 · Cited by 86
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Klassen, A. F., Pusic, A. L., Scott, A., Klok, J., & Cano, S. J.
- Venue
- BMC Women's Health
- Published
- 2009-05-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 11-11
- ISSN
- 1472-6874 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2065022050
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 7.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Satisfaction and quality of life in women who undergo breast surgery: A qualitative study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1472-6874-9-11
- The paper
- Klassen, A. F., Pusic, A. L., Scott, A., Klok, J., & Cano, S. J. (2009). Satisfaction and quality of life in women who undergo breast surgery: A qualitative study. BMC Women's Health. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-9-11
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.