CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 154Ethics and bioethics in healthcareEthics in medical practiceMedical and Health Sciences Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical ethics revisited

Open access
Singer, Peter A, Pellegrino, Edmund D, Siegler, Mark·2001·BMC Medical Ethics
DOI 10.1186/1472-6939-2-1PMC PMC32193
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

A decade ago, we reviewed the field of clinical ethics; assessed its progress in research, education, and ethics committees and consultation; and made predictions about the future of the field. In this article, we revisit clinical ethics to examine our earlier observations, highlight key developments, and discuss remaining challenges for clinical ethics, including the need to develop a global perspective on clinical ethics problems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1472-6939-2-1

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. World Health Organization: World Health Report Health Systems: Improving Performance. Geneva. 2000
  2. Jonsen AR, Siegler M, Winslade W: Clinical ethics, 4th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill. 1998
  3. Potter VR: Global bioethics. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press. 1988
  4. Daar AS, Mattei J-F: Medical genetics and biotechnology: Implications for public health. Document WHO/WIP/GPE/00.1), Annex 1 of the informal consultation on ethical issues in genetics, cloning, and biotechnology: possible future directions for WHO. 1999

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Singer, P. A., Pellegrino, E. D., & Siegler, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Georgetown University Medical Center (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Singer, Peter A
Venue
BMC Medical Ethics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2001-04-26
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
E1-E1
ISSN
1472-6939 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1186/1472-6939-2-1
PMC
PMC32193
OpenAlex
W2165699858
Cited by
154
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • BMC Medical Ethics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TSpace (University of Toronto) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Ethics in medical practice
  • Social Sciences › Law › Medical and Health Sciences Research
Keywords
clinical ethics, clinical ethics education, ethics consultation, hospital ethics committees
MeSH terms
Bioethics, Curriculum, Education, Medical, Continuing, Ethics, Institutional, Publishing, Teaching, Ethics, Clinical, Ethics Committees, Clinical, Ethics Consultation, Interdisciplinary Communication, Empirical Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review