CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 38

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The experience of international nursing students studying for a PhD in the U.K: A qualitative study

Evans, Catrin, Stevenson, Keith·2011·BMC Nursing
DOI 10.1186/1472-6955-10-11PMC PMC3126772
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1472-6955-10-11

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 53

  1. Ketefian S: Doctoral education in the context of international development strategies. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2008, 45: 1401-1402. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.02.002. · DOI
  2. ICN: The global nursing shortage: priority areas for intervention. 2006, Geneva: International Council of Nurses
  3. Ketefian S, Davidson P, Daly J, Chang E, Srisuphan W: Issues and challenges in international doctoral education in nursing. Nursing and Health Sciences. 2005, 7: 150-156. 10.1111/j.1442-2018.2005.00240.x. · DOI
  4. The Economist: The disposable academic. The Economist. 2010, [ http:///www.economist.com/node/17723223/print ]
  5. Kim M: Clinical academic research careers in nursing: towards global nursing. Journal of Research in Nursing. 2009, 14 (2): 125-132. 10.1177/1744987108101953. · DOI
  6. Evans C, Stevenson K: The learning experiences of international doctoral students with particular reference to nursing students: A literature review. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2010, 47: 239-250. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.05.025. · DOI
  7. Kim M, Lee H, Kim H, Ahn Y, Kinm E, Yun S, Lee K: Quality of faculty, students, curriculum and resources for nursing doctoral education in Korea: a focus group study. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2010, 47: 295-306. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.07.005. · DOI
  8. Kim M, McKenna H, Ketefian S: Global quality criteria, standards and indicators for doctoral programmes in nursing: literature review and guideline development. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2006, 43 (4): 477-489. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.07.003. · DOI
  9. McKenna H: Doctoral education: some treasonable thoughts. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2005, 42: 245-246. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.01.001. · DOI
  10. Dreher H, Smith M: Global perspectives on the professional doctorate. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2010
  11. Roberts G: Set for success: the supply of people with science, engineering and technology skills. 2002, London: Department of Trade and Industry and Department of Education and Skills
  12. Ryan J: Postgraduate supervision. Teaching international students: improving learning for all. Edited by: Carroll J, Ryan J. 2005, London: Routledge, 101-107.
  13. Aspland T, O'Donoghue T: Quality in supervising international students?. Quality in postgraduate education. Edited by: Zuber-Skerritt O, Ryan Y. 1994, London: Kogan-Page, 59-76.
  14. Aspland T: You learn round and I learn square: Mei's story. Supervising postgraduates from non-English speaking backgrounds. Edited by: Ryan Y, Zuber-Skerritt O. 1999, Society for Research in Higher Education & Open University Press, 25-39.
  15. Cadman K: 'Voices in the air': evaluations of the learning experiences of international postgraduates and their supervisors. Teaching in Higher Education. 2000, 5 (4): 475-491. 10.1080/713699170. · DOI
  16. McClure J: Preparing a laboratory-based thesis: Chinese international research students' experiences of supervision. Teaching in Higher Education. 2005, 10 (1): 3-16. 10.1080/1356251052000291530. · DOI
  17. Borg M, Maunder R, Jiang X, Walsh E, Fry H, Di Napoli R: International students and academic acculturation: the role of relationships in the doctoral process. Internationalisation and the student voice: higher education perspectives. Edited by: Jones E. 2010, London: Routledge, 181-193.
  18. McClure J: International graduates' cross-cultural adjustment: experiences, coping strategies and suggested programmatic responses. Teaching in Higher Education. 2007, 12 (2): 199-217. 10.1080/13562510701191976. · DOI
  19. Gardner S: "I heard it through the grapevine": doctoral student socialisation in chemistry and history. Higher Education. 2007, 54 (5): 723-740. 10.1007/s10734-006-9020-x. · DOI
  20. Wang R, Lethbridge D: Becoming gold-plated: Chinese nurses studying abroad. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 1995, 27 (2): 131-134. 10.1111/j.1547-5069.1995.tb00836.x. · DOI
  21. Evans C: The experience of international doctoral education in nursing: An exploratory survey of staff and international nursing students in a British university. Nurse Education Today. 2007, 27: 499-505. 10.1016/j.nedt.2006.08.010. · DOI
  22. Carty R, O'Grady E, Wichaikhum O, Bull J: Opportunities in preparing global leaders in nursing. Journal of Professional Nursing. 2002, 18 (2): 70-77. 10.1053/jpnu.2002.123725. · DOI
  23. Rubin H, Rubin I: Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data. 1995, Thousand Oaks, California: Sage
  24. Creswell J: Qualitative inquiry and research design. 1998, London: Sage
  25. Avis M: Do we need methodological theory to do qualitative research?. Qualitative Health Research. 2003, 13 (7): 995-1004. 10.1177/1049732303253298. · DOI
  26. Lincoln S, Guba E: Naturalistic Inquiry. 1985, California: Sage
  27. Kvale S: Interviews: an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. 1996, California: Sage
  28. Cresswell J: Standards of Quality and Verification. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. Edited by: Cresswell J. 1998, London: Sage, 193-218.
  29. Silverman D: Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction. 1993, London: Sage
  30. Boyatzis R: Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development. 1998, London: Sage
  31. Lincoln S: Emerging criteria for quality in qualitative and interpretive research. Qualitative Inquiry. 1995, 1: 275-289. 10.1177/107780049500100301. · DOI · Paper page
  32. Lovitts B: Being a good course taker is not enough: a theoretical perspective on the transition to independent research. Studies in Higher Education. 2005, 30 (2): 137-154. 10.1080/03075070500043093. · DOI · Paper page
  33. Lovitts B: The transition to independent research: who makes it, who doesn't and why. The Journal of Higher Education. 2008, 79 (3): 296-325. 10.1353/jhe.0.0006. · DOI
  34. Goode J: Empowering or disempowering the international PhD student? Constructions of the dependent and independent learner. British Journal of Sociology of Education. 2007, 28 (5): 589-603. 10.1080/01425690701505409. · DOI
  35. Carroll J, Ryan J: Teaching international students: improving learning for all. 2005, London: Routledge
  36. Deem R, Brehony K: Doctoral students' access to research cultures: are some more unequal than others?. Studies in Higher Education. 2000, 25 (2): 149-165. 10.1080/713696138. · DOI
  37. Haggis T: Exploring the black box of process: a comparison of theoretical notions of the 'adult learner' with accounts of postgraduate learning experience. Studies in Higher Education. 2002, 27 (2): 207-220. 10.1080/03075070220119986. · DOI
  38. Johnson L, Lee A, Green B: The PhD and the autonomous self: gender, rationality and postgraduate pedagogy. Studies in Higher Education. 2000, 25 (2): 135-147. 10.1080/713696141. · DOI
  39. Carr S, Lhussier M, Chandler C: The supervision of professional doctorates: experiences of the process. Nurse Education Today. 2010, 30: 279-284. 10.1016/j.nedt.2009.03.004. · DOI
  40. Ellis L: Doctoral education for workforce and practice development: the professional doctorate. INDEN (International Network of Doctoral Education in Nursing) Newsletter. 2008, 7 (3): 3-7. [ http://www.umich.edu/~inden/ ]
  41. Lee N: Professional doctorate supervision: exploring student and supervisor experiences. Nurse Education Today. 2009, 29: 641-648. 10.1016/j.nedt.2009.02.004. · DOI
  42. Hockey J: New territory: problems of adjusting to the first year of a social science PhD. Studies in Higher Education. 1994, 19 (2): 177-190. 10.1080/03075079412331382027. · DOI
  43. Robinson-Pant A: Internationalisation of higher education: challenges for the doctoral supervisor. The Routledge Doctoral Supervisor's Companion. Edited by: Walker M, Thomson P. 2010, London: Routledge, 147-158.
  44. Barnacle R: Research education ontologies: exploring doctoral becoming. Higher Education Research and Development. 2005, 24 (2): 179-188. 10.1080/07294360500062995. · DOI
  45. Petersen E: Negotiating academicity: postgraduate research supervision as category boundary work. Studies in Higher Education. 2007, 32 (4): 475-487. 10.1080/03075070701476167. · DOI
  46. Goode J: Perhaps I should be more proactive in changing my own supervision? Student agency in 'doing supervision'. The Routledge Doctoral Student's Companion: Getting to Grips with Research in Education and the Social Sciences. Edited by: Thomson P, Walker M. 2010, London: Routledge
  47. Lee A: How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral research supervision?. Studies in Higher Education. 2008, 33 (3): 267-281. 10.1080/03075070802049202. · DOI
  48. Deuchar R: Facilitator, director or critical friend? contradiction and congruence in doctoral supervision styles. Teaching in Higher Education. 2008, 13 (4): 489-500. 10.1080/13562510802193905. · DOI
  49. Halse C, Malfroy J: Retheorizing doctoral supervision as professional work. Studies in Higher Education. 2010, 35 (1): 79-92. 10.1080/03075070902906798. · DOI
  50. Seale C: The Quality of Qualitative Research. 1999, London: Sage · DOI
  51. Kjellgren K, Welin C, Danielson E: Evaluation of doctoral nursing programmes: a review and a strategy for follow up. Nurse Education Today. 2005, 25: 316-325. 10.1016/j.nedt.2005.02.002. · DOI
  52. Anderson C: Current strengths and limitations of doctoral education in nursing: are we prepared for the future?. Journal of Professional Nursing. 2000, 16 (4): 191-200. 10.1053/jpnu.2000.7830. · DOI
  53. Holzemer W, Chambers D: Healthy nursing doctoral programmes: relationships between perceptions of the academic environment and productivity of faculty and alumni. Research in Nursing and Health. 1986, 9 (4): 299-307. 10.1002/nur.4770090407. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Evans, C., & Stevenson, K.
Venue
BMC Nursing
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2011-06-13
Volume
10
Issue
1
ISSN
1472-6955
DOI
10.1186/1472-6955-10-11
PMC
PMC3126772
Cited by
38
References
1
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review