The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evaluation of primary care midwifery in the Netherlands: design and rationale of a dynamic cohort study (DELIVER)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Some studies reported on the relationship between pregnant women’s level of education and their behaviors during pregnancy, such as compliance with folic acid supplementation [156] and daily fruit consumption [157].”
From A Comprehensive Review on Social Inequalities and Pregnancy Outcome—Identification of Relevant Pathways and Mechanisms (2022) · cites this paper as [157]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Prins M: Praktische verloskunde. 2009, Houten: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum · DOI
- Hingstman L, Kenens RJ: Cijfers uit de registratie van verloskundigen. Peiling 2009. 2009
- Westert GP, Schellevis FG, de Bakker DH, Groenewegen PP, Bensing JM, van der Zee J: Monitoring health inequalities through general practice: the Second Dutch National Survey of General Practice. Eur J Public Health. 2005, 15: 59-65. · DOI
- Wiegers TA: Workload of primary-care midwives. Midwifery. 2007, 23: 425-432. 10.1016/j.midw.2006.06.007. · DOI
- Wiegers T, Janssen BM: Monitor verloskundige zorgverlening. 2006
- Sandin-Bojo AK, Kvist LJ: Care in labor: a Swedish survey using the Bologna Score. Birth. 2008, 35: 321-328. 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00259.x. · DOI
- Hodnett ED, Simmons-Tropea DA: The Labour Agentry Scale: psychometric properties of an instrument measuring control during childbirth. Res Nurs Health. 1987, 10: 301-310. 10.1002/nur.4770100503. · DOI
- The EuroQol group: EuroQol: a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990, 16: 208.
- Seymour RA, Simpson JM, Charlton JE, Phillips ME: An evaluation of length and end-phrase of visual analogue scales in dental pain. Pain. 1985, 21: 177-185. 10.1016/0304-3959(85)90287-8. · DOI
- van Wagtendonk I, van der Hoek L, Wiegers T: Ontwikkeling van een CQ-index voor de kraamzorg. 2010
- Roter D: The ROTER method of interaction process analysis. 2006, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University
- Lucassen P, Olde Hartman T: Kwalitatief onderzoek. Praktische methoden voor de medische praktijk. 2007, Houten: Bohn, Stafleu en van Loghum · DOI
- Krueger RA, Casey MA: Focus groups. A practical guide for applied research. 2000, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publisher, 3
Cited by
Simoncic, V., Deguen, S., Enaux, C., Vandentorren, S., & Kihal-Talantikite, W. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph192416592 · Cited by 83
Baas, C. I., Wiegers, T. A., de Cock, T. P., Erwich, J. J. H. M., Spelten, E. R., & Hutton, E. K. (2017) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2017.09.007 · Cited by 15
Self-citationWitteveen, A. B., Henrichs, J., Walker, A. L., Bohlmeijer, E. T., Burger, H., Fontein-Kuipers, Y., Schellevis, F. G., Stramrood, C. A. I., Olff, M., Verhoeven, C. J., et al. (2020) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-020-03395-9 · Cited by 13
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Manniën, J., Klomp, T., Wiegers, T., Pereboom, M., Brug, J., de Jonge, A., van der Meijde, M., Hutton, E., Schellevis, F., & Spelten, E.
- Venue
- BMC Health Services Research
- Published
- 2012-03-20
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1472-6963
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of primary care midwifery in the Netherlands: design and rationale of a dynamic cohort study (DELIVER). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1472-6963-12-69
- The paper
- Manniën, J., Klomp, T., Wiegers, T., Pereboom, M., Brug, J., de Jonge, A., van der Meijde, M., Hutton, E., Schellevis, F., & Spelten, E. (2012). Evaluation of primary care midwifery in the Netherlands: design and rationale of a dynamic cohort study (DELIVER). BMC Health Services Research. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-69
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
