The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Economic burden of diabetes mellitus in the WHO African region
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: In 2000, the prevalence of diabetes among the 46 countries of the WHO African Region was estimated at 7.02 million people. Evidence from North America, Europe, Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean indicates that diabetes exerts a heavy health and economic burden on society. Unfortunately, there is a dearth of such evidence in the WHO African Region. The objective of this study was to estimate the economic burden associated with diabetes mellitus in the countries in the African Region. METHODS: Drawing information from various secondary sources, this study used standard cost-of-illness methods to estimate: (a) the direct costs, i.e. those borne by the health systems and the families in directly addressing the problem; and (b) the indirect costs, i.e. the losses in productivity attributable to premature mortality, permanent disability and temporary disability caused by the disease. Prevalence estimates of diabetes for the year 2000 were used to calculate direct and indirect costs of diabetes mellitus. A discount rate of 3% was used to convert future earnings lost into their present values. The economic burden analysis was done for three groups of countries, i.e. 6 countries whose gross national income (GNI) per capita was greater than 8000 international dollars (i.e. in purchasing power parity), 6 countries with Int$2000-7999 and 33 countries with less than Int$2000. GNI for Zimbabwe was missing. RESULTS: The 7.02 million cases of diabetes recorded by countries of the African Region in 2000 resulted in a total economic loss of Int$25.51 billion (PPP). Approximately 43.65%, 10.03% and 46.32% of that loss was incurred by groups 1, 2 and 3 countries, respectively. This translated into grand total economic loss of Int$11,431.6, Int$4,770.6 and Int$ 2,144.3 per diabetes case per year in the three groups respectively. CONCLUSION: In spite of data limitations, the estimates reported here show that diabetes imposes a substantial economic burden on countries of the WHO African Region. That heavy burden underscores the urgent need for increased investments in the prevention and management of diabetes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Health challenges in Africa and the way forward
Kirigia, J., & Barry, S. (2008) · International Archives of Medicine · doi:10.1186/1755-7682-1-27 · Cited by 110
Self-citation
Cited by
Hall, V., Thomsen, R. W., Henriksen, O., & Lohse, N. (2011) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-564 · Cited by 624
Achila, O. O., Ghebretinsae, M., Kidane, A., Simon, M., Makonen, S., & Rezene, Y. (2020) · Journal of Diabetes Research · doi:10.1155/2020/5901569 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Kirigia, J. M., Sambo, H. B., Sambo, L. G., & Barry, S. P.
- Venue
- BMC International Health and Human Rights
- Published
- 2009-03-31
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 6-6
- ISSN
- 1472-698X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2123842802
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Economic burden of diabetes mellitus in the WHO African region. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1472-698x-9-6
- The paper
- Kirigia, J. M., Sambo, H. B., Sambo, L. G., & Barry, S. P. (2009). Economic burden of diabetes mellitus in the WHO African region. BMC International Health and Human Rights. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-698x-9-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.