Cited by 68Malaria Research and ControlHemoglobinopathies and Related DisordersTravel-related health issues

Clinical malaria in African pregnant women

Open access
Bardají, Azucena, Sigauque, Betuel, Bruni, Laia, Romagosa, Cleofé, Sanz, Sergi, Mabunda, Samuel, Mandomando, Inacio, Aponte, John +3 more·2008·Malaria Journal

Abstract

Background: There is a widespread notion, based on limited information, that in areas of stable malaria transmission most pregnant women with Plasmodium falciparum infection are asymptomatic. This study aim to characterize the clinical presentation of malaria in African pregnant women and to evaluate the adequacy of case management based on clinical complaints. Methods: A hospital-based descriptive study between August 2003 and November 2005 was conducted at the maternity clinic of a rural hospital in Mozambique. All women attending the maternity clinic were invited to participate. A total of 2,330 women made 3,437 eligible visits, 3129 were analysed, the remainder were excluded because diagnostic results were unavailable or they were repeat visits. Women gave a standardized clinical history and had a medical exam. Malaria parasitaemia and haematocrit in capillary blood was determined for all women with signs or symptoms compatible with malaria including: presence and history of fever, arthromyalgias, headache, history of convulsions and pallor. Outcome measure was association of malaria symptoms or signs with positive blood slide for malaria parasitaemia. Results: In 77.4% of visits pregnant women had symptoms suggestive of malaria; 23% (708/3129) were in the first trimester. Malaria parasitaemia was confirmed in 26.9% (842/3129) of visits. Headache, arthromyalgias and history of fever were the most common symptoms (86.5%, 74.8% and 65.4%) presented, but their positive predictive values for malaria parasitaemia were low [28% (27–30), 29% (28–31), and 33% (31–35), respectively]. Conclusion: Symptoms suggestive of malaria were very frequent among pregnant women attending a rural maternity clinic in an area of stable malaria transmission. However, less than a third of them were parasitaemic. In the absence of microscopy or rapid diagnostic tests, a large proportion of women, including those in the first trimester of gestation, would be unnecessarily receiving antimalarial drugs, often those with unknown safety profiles for pregnancy. Accessibility to malaria diagnostic tools needs to be improved for pregnant women and drugs with a safety profile in all gestational ages are urgently needed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1475-2875-7-27

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Mozambique, over 70% of pregnant women with clinical symptoms of malaria have negative blood smears.

    “In Mozambique, over 70% of pregnant women with clinical symptoms of malaria (fever, headache and joint pain) have negative BS [8].”

    From Diagnosing malaria in pregnancy: An update (2012) · cites this paper as [8]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 68

Authors
Bardají, A., Sigauque, B., Bruni, L., Romagosa, C., Sanz, S., Mabunda, S., Mandomando, I., Aponte, J., Sevene, E., Alonso, P. L., & Menéndez, C.
Affiliations
  • Consorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer (ES)
  • Manhiça Health Research Centre (MZ)
  • Ministry of Health (MZ)
  • Eduardo Mondlane University (MZ)
Corresponding author
Menéndez, Clara
Venue
Malaria Journal
Published
2008-01-30
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
27-27
ISSN
1475-2875 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1987836379
Cited by
68
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Malaria Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Travel-related health issues
Keywords
malaria in pregnancy, Plasmodium falciparum, malaria parasitaemia, malaria symptoms, positive predictive value, first trimester, Mozambique
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Gestational Age, Humans, Malaria, Mozambique, Parity, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Rural Population, Seasons, Pregnancy Complications, Parasitic, Parasitemia, Pregnant People, Black People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review