The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Differences in the way a mammalian cell and yeast cells coordinate cell growth and cell-cycle progression
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: It is widely believed that cell-size checkpoints help to coordinate cell growth and cell-cycle progression, so that proliferating eukaryotic cells maintain their size. There is strong evidence for such size checkpoints in yeasts, which maintain a constant cell-size distribution as they proliferate, even though large yeast cells grow faster than small yeast cells. Moreover, when yeast cells are shifted to better or worse nutrient conditions, they alter their size threshold within one cell cycle. Populations of mammalian cells can also maintain a constant size distribution as they proliferate, but it is not known whether this depends on cell-size checkpoints. RESULTS: We show that proliferating rat Schwann cells do not require a cell-size checkpoint to maintain a constant cell-size distribution, as, unlike yeasts, large and small Schwann cells grow at the same rate, which depends on the concentration of extracellular growth factors. In addition, when shifted from serum-free to serum-containing medium, Schwann cells take many divisions to increase their size to that appropriate to the new condition, suggesting that they do not have cell-size checkpoints similar to those in yeasts. CONCLUSIONS: Proliferating Schwann cells and yeast cells seem to use different mechanisms to coordinate their growth with cell-cycle progression. Whereas yeast cells use cell-size checkpoints, Schwann cells apparently do not. It seems likely that many mammalian cells resemble Schwann cells in this respect.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Metabolic Reprogramming: A Cancer Hallmark Even Warburg Did Not Anticipate
Ward, P. S., & Thompson, C. B. (2012) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2012.02.014 · Cited by 3,233
“Big it up”: endoreduplication and cell-size control in plants
Sugimoto-Shirasu, K., & Roberts, K. (2003) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2003.09.009 · Cited by 577
Signalling to translation: How signal transduction pathways control the protein synthetic machinery
Proud, C. G. (2007) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj20070024 · Cited by 520
Physicochemical Properties of Cells and Their Effects on Intrinsically Disordered Proteins (IDPs)
Theillet, F.-X., Binolfi, A., Frembgen-Kesner, T., Hingorani, K., Sarkar, M., Kyne, C., Li, C., Crowley, P. B., Gierasch, L., Pielak, G. J., et al. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr400695p · Cited by 503
On being the right (cell) size
Ginzberg, M. B., Kafri, R., & Kirschner, M. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1245075 · Cited by 421
Metadata
- Authors
- Conlon, I., & Raff, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Biology
- Published
- 2003-04-24
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 7-7
- ISSN
- 1475-4924 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2142884934
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differences in the way a mammalian cell and yeast cells coordinate cell growth and cell-cycle progression. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1475-4924-2-7
- The paper
- Conlon, I., & Raff, M. (2003). Differences in the way a mammalian cell and yeast cells coordinate cell growth and cell-cycle progression. Journal of Biology. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-4924-2-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.