Development of very large electrode arrays for epiretinal stimulation (VLARS)
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Retinal implants have been developed to treat blindness causing retinal degenerations such as Retinitis pigmentosa (RP). The retinal stimulators are covering only a small portion of the retina usually in its center. To restore not only central vision but also a useful visual field retinal stimulators need to cover a larger area of the retina. However, large area retinal stimulators are much more difficult to implant into an eye. Some basic questions concerning this challenge should be answered in a series of experiments. METHODS: Large area retinal stimulators were fabricated as flexible multielectrode arrays (MEAs) using silicon technology with polyimide as the basic material for the substrate. Electrodes were made of gold covered with reactively sputtered iridium oxide. Several prototype designs were considered and implanted into enucleated porcine eyes. The prototype MEAs were also used as recording devices. RESULTS: Large area retinal stimulator MEAs were fabricated with a diameter of 12 mm covering a visual angle of 37.6° in a normal sighted human eye. The structures were flexible enough to be implanted in a folded state through an insertion nozzle. The implants could be positioned onto the retinal surface and fixated here using a retinal tack. Recording of spontaneous activity of retinal neurons was possible in vitro using these devices. CONCLUSIONS: Large flexible MEAs covering a wider area of the retina as current devices could be fabricated using silicon technology with polyimide as a base material. Principal surgical techniques were established to insert such large devices into an eye and the devices could also be used for recording of retinal neural activity.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A fixed electrode number reduces the electrode density if electrodes are spread over a wider surface area, which might worsen visual resolution.
“A fixed electrode number reduces the electrode density if electrodes are spread over a wider surface area, which might worsen visual resolution [125].”
From Advances in visual prostheses: engineering and biological challenges (2022) · cites this paper as [125]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 43
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Koch C Fassbender H Nolten U Goertz M Mokwa W Fabrication and assembly techniques for a 3rd generation wireless epiretinal prosthesis 2008 Aachen, Germany: Proc. of MME 2008, 19th Workshop on Micromachining, Micromechanics and Microsystems 365 368 ISBN: 978-3-00-025529-8
- Mokwa W Görtz M Koch C Krisch I Trieu HK Walter P Intraocular epiretinal Prothesis to restore vision in blind humans Proc. of the 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Vancouver 2008 Piscataway, NJ, USA: EMBS 5790 5793 19164033
- Authors
- Waschkowski, F., Hesse, S., Rieck, A. C., Lohmann, T., Brockmann, C., Laube, T., Bornfeld, N., Thumann, G., Walter, P., Mokwa, W., Johnen, S., & Roessler, G.
- Affiliations
- RWTH Aachen University (DE)
- Universitätsklinikum Aachen (DE)
- Essen University Hospital (DE)
- University Hospital of Geneva (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Walter, Peter
- ORCID
- Venue
- BioMedical Engineering OnLine
- Published
- 2014-02-06
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 11-11
- ISSN
- 1475-925X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3976033
- OpenAlex
- W2118336815
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 1.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- BioMedical Engineering OnLine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (WA 1472/6-1)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
- Keywords
- epiretinal stimulation, retinal prosthesis, microelectrode arrays, polyimide substrate, iridium oxide electrodes, retinitis pigmentosa, visual field restoration
- MeSH terms
- Biomedical Engineering, Computer Simulation, Electrodes, Implanted, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Equipment Design, Gold, Humans, Imides, Iridium, Retina, Retinitis Pigmentosa
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review