Cited by 25Advanced Image Processing TechniquesVideo Coding and Compression TechnologiesImage Enhancement Techniques

Improved content aware scene retargeting for retinitis pigmentosa patients

Open access
Al-Atabany, Walid I, Tong, Tzyy, Degenaar, Patrick A·2010·BioMedical Engineering OnLine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In this paper we present a novel scene retargeting technique to reduce the visual scene while maintaining the size of the key features. The algorithm is scalable to implementation onto portable devices, and thus, has potential for augmented reality systems to provide visual support for those with tunnel vision. We therefore test the efficacy of our algorithm on shrinking the visual scene into the remaining field of view for those patients. METHODS: Simple spatial compression of visual scenes makes objects appear further away. We have therefore developed an algorithm which removes low importance information, maintaining the size of the significant features. Previous approaches in this field have included seam carving, which removes low importance seams from the scene, and shrinkability which dynamically shrinks the scene according to a generated importance map. The former method causes significant artifacts and the latter is inefficient. In this work we have developed a new algorithm, combining the best aspects of both these two previous methods. In particular, our approach is to generate a shrinkability importance map using as seam based approach. We then use it to dynamically shrink the scene in similar fashion to the shrinkability method. Importantly, we have implemented it so that it can be used in real time without prior knowledge of future frames. RESULTS: We have evaluated and compared our algorithm to the seam carving and image shrinkability approaches from a content preservation perspective and a compression quality perspective. Also our technique has been evaluated and tested on a trial included 20 participants with simulated tunnel vision. Results show the robustness of our method at reducing scenes up to 50% with minimal distortion. We also demonstrate efficacy in its use for those with simulated tunnel vision of 22 degrees of field of view or less. CONCLUSIONS: Our approach allows us to perform content aware video resizing in real time using only information from previous frames to avoid jitter. Also our method has a great benefit over the ordinary resizing method and even over other image retargeting methods. We show that the benefit derived from this algorithm is significant to patients with fields of view 20° or less.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1475-925x-9-52

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SPV studies suggest that one benefit of image processing may be to provide an importance mapping that can aid scene understanding by enhancing certain image features or regions of interest at the expense of discarding less important or distracting information.

    “SPV studies suggest that one benefit of image processing may be to provide an importance mapping that can aid scene understanding; that is, to enhance certain image features or regions of interest, at the expense of discarding less important or distracting information (Boyle et al., 2008; Al-Atabany et al., 2010; Horne et al., 2016; Sanchez-Garcia et al., 2019).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 42 · Cited by 25

Authors
Al-Atabany, W. I., Tong, T., & Degenaar, P. A.
Affiliations
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • Newcastle University (GB)
Venue
BioMedical Engineering OnLine
Published
2010
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
52
ISSN
1475-925X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2128089714
Cited by
25
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BioMedical Engineering OnLine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity) (cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • Royal Society
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Video Coding and Compression Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Enhancement Techniques
Keywords
retinitis pigmentosa, tunnel vision, visual impairment, content-aware image resizing, seam carving, importance map, augmented reality, real-time video processing
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Awareness, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Retinitis Pigmentosa, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review