Cited by 322Health Education and ValidationCardiac Health and Mental HealthPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Testing the performance of the ENRICHD social support instrument in cardiac patients

Open access
Vaglio, Joseph, Conard, Mark, Poston, Walker S, O'Keefe, James, Haddock, C Keith, House, John, Spertus, John A·2004·Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous investigations suggest an important role of social support in the outcomes of patients treated for ischemic heart disease. The ENRICHD Social Support Instrument (ESSI) is a 7-item self-report survey that assesses social support. Validity and reliability of the ESSI, however, has not been formally tested in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: The ESSI, along with the Short Form-36 (SF-36), was sequentially administered to a cohort of 271 patients undergoing PCI. The test-retest reliability was examined with an intra-class correlation coefficient by comparing scores among 174 patients who completed both instruments 5 and 6 months after their procedure. Internal reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha at the time of patients' baseline procedure. The concurrent validity of the ESSI was assessed by comparing scores between depressed (MHI-5 score < 44) vs. non-depressed patients. The correlation between the ESSI and the SF-36 Social Functioning sub-scale, an accepted measure of social functioning, was also examined. RESULTS: Test-retest reliability showed no significant differences in mean scores among ESSI questionnaires administered 1 month apart (27.8+/-1.4 vs 27.8+/-1.5, p = 0.98). The intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.94 and Cronbach's alpha was 0.88. Mean ESSI scores were significantly lower among depressed vs. non-depressed patients (24.6+/-1.7 vs 27+/-1.4, p < 0.018) and a positive albeit modest correlation with social functioning was seen (r = 0.19, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The ESSI appears to be a valid and reliable measure of social support in patients undergoing treatment for coronary artery disease. It may prove to be a valuable method of controlling for patient variability in outcomes studies where the outcomes are related to patients' social support.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1477-7525-2-24

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 322

Authors
Vaglio, J., Conard, M., Poston, W. S., O'Keefe, J., Haddock, C. K., House, J., & Spertus, J. A.
Affiliations
Saint Luke's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Vaglio, Joseph
Venue
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
Published
2004-05-13
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
24-24
ISSN
1477-7525 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2117461307
Cited by
322
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 15
FWCI
10.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health and Quality of Life Outcomes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MOspace Institutional Repository (University of Missouri) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R01 HS011282, R-01 HS11282-01)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
social support, percutaneous coronary intervention, ischemic heart disease, coronary artery disease, test-retest reliability, internal consistency, concurrent validity, depression, social functioning, SF-36, psychometric validation
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Missouri, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Support, Cohort Studies, Atherectomy, Catheter Ablation, Myocardial Ischemia, Sickness Impact Profile

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review