The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of the NEI-VFQ and OSDI questionnaires in patients with Sjögren's syndrome-related dry eye
Open accessAbstract
Background: To examine the associations between vision-targeted health-related quality of life (VT-HRQ) and ocular surface parameters in patients with Sjögren's syndrome, a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by dry eye and dry mouth. Methods: Forty-two patients fulfilling European / American diagnostic criteria for Sjögren's syndrome underwent Schirmer testing without anesthesia, ocular surface vital dye staining; and measurement of tear film breakup time (TBUT). Subjects were administered the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) and the 25-item National Eye Institute Vision Functioning Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ). Main outcome measures included ocular surface parameters, OSDI subscales describing ocular discomfort (OSDI-symptoms), vision-related function (OSDI-function), and environmental triggers, and NEI-VFQ subscales. Results: Participants (aged 31–81 y; 95% female) all had moderate to severe dry eye. Associations of OSDI subscales with the ocular parameters were modest (Spearman r (ρ) < 0.22) and not statistically significant. Associations of NEI-VFQ subscales with the ocular parameters reached borderline significance for the near vision subscale with TBUT (ρ = 0.32, p = .05) and for the distance vision subscale with van Bijsterveld score (ρ = 0.33, p = .04). The strongest associations of the two questionnaires were for: ocular pain and mental function with OSDI-symptoms (ρ = 0.60 and 0.45, respectively); and general vision, ocular pain, mental function, role function, and driving with OSDI-function (ρ = 0.60, 0.50, 0.61, 0.64, 0.57, and 0.67, respectively). Conclusions: Associations between conventional objective measures of dry eye and VT-HRQ were modest. The generic NEI-VFQ was similar to the disease-specific OSDI in its ability to measure the impact of Sjögren's syndrome-related dry eye on VT-HRQ.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measuring Functioning and Well-Being: The Medical Outcomes Study Approach
Stewart, A., & Ware, J. (1992) · doi:10.7249/cb361 · Cited by 2,689
Development of the 25-list-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire
Mangione, C. M. (2001) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.119.7.1050 · Cited by 2,230
Cited by
(2007) · The Ocular Surface · doi:10.1016/s1542-0124(12)70081-2 · Cited by 3,267
TFOS DEWS II Epidemiology Report
Stapleton, F., Alves, M., Bunya, V. Y., Jalbert, I., Lekhanont, K., Malet, F., Na, K.-S., Schaumberg, D., Uchino, M., Vehof, J., et al. (2017) · The Ocular Surface · doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.003 · Cited by 2,618
Self-citation(2007) · The Ocular Surface · doi:10.1016/s1542-0124(12)70082-4 · Cited by 1,227
Minimal Clinically Important Difference for the Ocular Surface Disease Index
Miller, K. L. (2010) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.356 · Cited by 598
Associations between signs and symptoms of dry eye disease: a systematic review
Bartlett, J., Keith, M., Sudharshan, L., & Snedecor, S. (2015) · Clinical Ophthalmology · doi:10.2147/opth.s89700 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Vitale, S., Goodman, L. A., Reed, G. F., & Smith, J. A.
- Venue
- Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
- Published
- 2004-09-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 44-44
- ISSN
- 1477-7525 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2117322871
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of the NEI-VFQ and OSDI questionnaires in patients with Sjögren's syndrome-related dry eye. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1477-7525-2-44
- The paper
- Vitale, S., Goodman, L. A., Reed, G. F., & Smith, J. A. (2004). Comparison of the NEI-VFQ and OSDI questionnaires in patients with Sjögren's syndrome-related dry eye. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-2-44
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.