The DOI matches its Crossref record; 93 of the 93 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The utilisation of health research in policy-making: concepts, examples and methods of assessment
Open accessAbstract
The importance of health research utilisation in policy-making, and of understanding the mechanisms involved, is increasingly recognised. Recent reports calling for more resources to improve health in developing countries, and global pressures for accountability, draw greater attention to research-informed policy-making. Key utilisation issues have been described for at least twenty years, but the growing focus on health research systems creates additional dimensions.The utilisation of health research in policy-making should contribute to policies that may eventually lead to desired outcomes, including health gains. In this article, exploration of these issues is combined with a review of various forms of policy-making. When this is linked to analysis of different types of health research, it assists in building a comprehensive account of the diverse meanings of research utilisation.Previous studies report methods and conceptual frameworks that have been applied, if with varying degrees of success, to record utilisation in policy-making. These studies reveal various examples of research impact within a general picture of underutilisation.Factors potentially enhancing utilisation can be identified by exploration of: priority setting; activities of the health research system at the interface between research and policy-making; and the role of the recipients, or 'receptors', of health research. An interfaces and receptors model provides a framework for analysis.Recommendations about possible methods for assessing health research utilisation follow identification of the purposes of such assessments. Our conclusion is that research utilisation can be better understood, and enhanced, by developing assessment methods informed by conceptual analysis and review of previous studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Exchange and Power in Social Life.
Bierstedt, R., & Blau, P. M. (1965) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091154 · Cited by 13,624
The Science of “Muddling Through”
Lindblom, C. E. (1959) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.2307/973677 · Cited by 8,513
A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice
Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1972) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392088 · Cited by 7,917
Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination
Haas, P. M. (1992) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818300001442 · Cited by 7,584
Arrow, K. J. (1973) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/0047-2727(73)90013-3 · Cited by 5,121
The New Production of Knowledge
Gibbons, M. (1994) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,405
Models of Man--Social and Rational
Solow, R. M., & Simon, H. A. (1958) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.2307/1926487 · Cited by 3,146
Evaluation: A Systematic Approach
Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (1979) · Cited by 2,943
The Many Meanings of Research Utilization
Weiss, C. H. (1979) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.2307/3109916 · Cited by 2,222
Macroeconomics and health: investing in health for economic development
Sachs, J. D. (2002) · Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública · doi:10.1590/s1020-49892002000800017 · Cited by 1,830
Cited by
GREENHALGH, T., JACKSON, C., SHAW, S., & JANAMIAN, T. (2016) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/1468-0009.12197 · Cited by 1,288
Knowledge Transfer and Exchange: Review and Synthesis of the Literature
MITTON, C., ADAIR, C. E., MCKENZIE, E., PATTEN, S. B., & PERRY, B. W. (2007) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00506.x · Cited by 1,050
Anderson, S., Allen, P., Peckham, S., & Goodwin, N. (2008) · Health Research Policy and Systems · doi:10.1186/1478-4505-6-7 · Cited by 653
Bridging the implementation gap between knowledge and action for health.
(2004) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · doi:10.1590/s0042-96862004001000005 · Cited by 527
Wilson, P. M., Petticrew, M., Calnan, M. W., & Nazareth, I. (2010) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-91 · Cited by 278
Metadata
- Authors
- Hanney, S. R., Gonzalez-Block, M. A., Buxton, M. J., & Kogan, M.
- Venue
- Health Research Policy and Systems
- Published
- 2003-01-13
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 2-2
- ISSN
- 1478-4505 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2119608181
- Cited by
- 678
- References
- 93
- FWCI
- 41.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The utilisation of health research in policy-making: concepts, examples and methods of assessment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1478-4505-1-2
- The paper
- Hanney, S. R., Gonzalez-Block, M. A., Buxton, M. J., & Kogan, M. (2003). The utilisation of health research in policy-making: concepts, examples and methods of assessment. Health Research Policy and Systems. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-1-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.