Advancing the application of systems thinking in health: a realist evaluation of a capacity building programme for district managers in Tumkur, India
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Health systems interventions, such as capacity-building of health workers, are implemented across districts in order to improve performance of healthcare organisations. However, such interventions often work in some settings and not in others. Local health systems could be visualised as complex adaptive systems that respond variously to inputs of capacity building interventions, depending on their local conditions and several individual, institutional, and environmental factors. We aim at demonstrating how the realist evaluation approach advances complex systems thinking in healthcare evaluation by applying the approach to understand organisational change within local health systems in the Tumkur district of southern India. METHODS: We collected data on several input, process, and outcome measures of performance of the talukas (administrative sub-units of the district) and explore the interplay between the individual, institutional, and contextual factors in contributing to the outcomes using qualitative data (interview transcripts and observation notes) and quantitative measures of commitment, self-efficacy, and supervision style. RESULTS: The talukas of Tumkur district responded differently to the intervention. Their responses can be explained by the interactions between several individual, institutional, and environmental factors. In a taluka with committed staff and a positive intention to make changes, the intervention worked through aligning with existing opportunities from the decentralisation process to improve performance. However, commitment towards the organisation was neither crucial nor sufficient. Committed staff in two other talukas were unable to actualise their intentions to improve organisational performance. In yet another taluka, the leadership was able to compensate for the lack of commitment. CONCLUSIONS: Capacity building of local health systems could work through aligning or countering existing relationships between internal (individual and organisational) and external (policy and socio-political environment) attributes of the organisation. At the design and implementation stage, intervention planners need to identify opportunities for such triggering alignments. Local health systems may differ in their internal configuration and hence capacity building programmes need to accommodate possibilities for change through different pathways. By a process of formulating and testing hypotheses, making critical comparisons, discovering empirical patterns, and monitoring their scope and extent, a realist evaluation enables a comprehensive assessment of system-wide change in health systems.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Marchal, B., van Belle, S., van Olmen, J., Hoerée, T., & Kegels, G. (2012) · Evaluation · doi:10.1177/1356389012442444 · Cited by 476 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Prashanth, N. S., Marchal, B., Devadasan, N., Kegels, G., & Criel, B.
- Affiliations
- Institute of Public Health Bengaluru (IN)
- Instituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Prashanth, Nuggehalli Srinivas
- Venue
- Health Research Policy and Systems
- Published
- 2014-08-26
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 42-42
- ISSN
- 1478-4505 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4245764
- OpenAlex
- W2157946136
- Cited by
- 81
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 9.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Health Research Policy and Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare Systems and Practices
- Keywords
- systems thinking, realist evaluation, capacity building, district health managers, local health systems, complex adaptive systems, organizational change, healthcare workers, employee commitment, self-efficacy, supervision styles, decentralization, health system performance, Tumkur district
- MeSH terms
- Delivery of Health Care, Government Programs, Health Personnel, Humans, India, Leadership, Program Evaluation, Capacity Building
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review