The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Accuracy and completeness of mortality data in the Department of Veterans Affairs
Open accessAbstract
Background: One of the national mortality databases in the U.S. is the Beneficiary Identification and Record Locator Subsystem (BIRLS) Death File that contains death dates of those who have received any benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). The completeness of this database was shown to vary widely from cohort to cohort in previous studies. Three other sources of death dates are available in the VA that can complement the BIRLS Death File. The objective of this study is to evaluate the completeness and accuracy of death dates in the four sources available in the VA and to examine whether these four sources can be combined into a database with improved completeness and accuracy. Methods: A random sample of 3,000 was drawn from 8.3 million veterans who received benefits from the VA between 1997 and 1999 and were alive on January 1, 1999 according to at least one source. Death dates found in BIRLS Death File, Medical SAS Inpatient Datasets, Medicare Vital Status, and Social Security Administration (SSA) Death Master File were compared with dates obtained from the National Death Index. A combined dataset from these sources was also compared with National Death Index dates. Results: Compared with the National Death Index, sensitivity (or the percentage of death dates correctly recorded in a source) was 77.4% for BIRLS Death File, 12.0% for Medical SAS Inpatient Datasets, 83.2% for Medicare Vital Status, and 92.1% for SSA Death Master File. Over 95% of death dates in these sources agreed exactly with dates from the National Death Index. Death dates in the combined dataset demonstrated 98.3% sensitivity and 97.6% exact agreement with dates from the National Death Index. Conclusion: The BIRLS Death File is not an adequate source of mortality data for the VA population due to incompleteness. When the four sources of mortality data are carefully combined, the resulting dataset can provide more timely data for death ascertainment than the National Death Index and has comparable accuracy and completeness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
TEST OF THE NATIONAL DEATH INDEX
STAMPFER, M. J., WILLETT, W. C., SPEIZER, F. E., DYSERT, D. C., LIPNICK, R., ROSNER, B., & HENNEKENS, C. H. (1984) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113804 · Cited by 790
A Primer and Comparative Review of Major U.S. Mortality Databases
Cowper, D. C., Kubal, J. D., Maynard, C., & Hynes, D. M. (2002) · Annals of Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/s1047-2797(01)00285-x · Cited by 486
Self-citationYoung, B. A., Maynard, C., & Boyko, E. J. (2003) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.26.8.2392 · Cited by 351
Self-citationBOYLE, C. A., & DECOUFLÉ, P. (1990) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115470 · Cited by 298
Fleming, C., Fisher, E. S., Chang, C.-H., Bubolz, T. A., & Malenka, D. J. (1992) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199205000-00001 · Cited by 226
Wentworth, D. N., Neaton, J. D., & Rasmussen, W. L. (1983) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.73.11.1270 · Cited by 222
Mortality Ascertainment in the Veteran Population: Alternatives to the National Death Index
Fisher, S. G., Weber, L., Goldberg, J., & Davis, F. (1995) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117426 · Cited by 192
Williams, B. C., Demitrack, L. B., & Fries, B. E. (1992) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.82.8.1145 · Cited by 152
Hill, M. E., & Rosenwaike, I. (2001) · PubMed · Cited by 145
Impact of Renal Insufficiency on Mortality in Advanced Lower Extremity Peripheral Arterial Disease
O’Hare, A. M., Bertenthal, D., Shlipak, M. G., Sen, Ś., & Chren, M. (2004) · Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.1681/asn.2004050409 · Cited by 136
Cited by
Association Between Opioid Prescribing Patterns and Opioid Overdose-Related Deaths
Bohnert, A. S. B. (2011) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2011.370 · Cited by 1,509
Vigen, R. (2013) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2013.280386 · Cited by 1,003
Risk of Hepatocellular Cancer in HCV Patients Treated With Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents
Kanwal, F., Kramer, J., Asch, S. M., Chayanupatkul, M., Cao, Y., & El-Serag, H. B. (2017) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2017.06.012 · Cited by 931
Risk of hepatocellular cancer in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
Kanwal, F., Kramer, J. R., Mapakshi, S., Natarajan, Y., Chayanupatkul, M., Richardson, P. A., Li, L., Desiderio, R., Thrift, A. P., Asch, S. M., et al. (2018) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2018.08.024 · Cited by 795
Association Between Bariatric Surgery and Long-term Survival
Arterburn, D. E., Olsen, M. K., Smith, V. A., Livingston, E. H., Van Scoyoc, L., Yancy, W. S., Eid, G., Weidenbacher, H., & Maciejewski, M. L. (2015) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2014.16968 · Cited by 479
Metadata
- Authors
- Sohn, M.-W., Arnold, N., Maynard, C., & Hynes, D. M.
- Venue
- Population Health Metrics
- Published
- 2006-04-10
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 2-2
- ISSN
- 1478-7954 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1547708675
- Cited by
- 542
- References
- 23
- FWCI
- 22.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accuracy and completeness of mortality data in the Department of Veterans Affairs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1478-7954-4-2
- The paper
- Sohn, M.-W., Arnold, N., Maynard, C., & Hynes, D. M. (2006). Accuracy and completeness of mortality data in the Department of Veterans Affairs. Population Health Metrics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-7954-4-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.