Cited by 241Mesenchymal stem cell researchCancer, Hypoxia, and MetabolismHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Effects of hypoxic culture conditions on umbilical cord-derived human mesenchymal stem cells

Open access
Lavrentieva, Antonina, Majore, Ingrida, Kasper, Cornelia, Hass, Ralf·2010·Cell Communication and Signaling

Abstract

Following cultivation of distinct mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) populations derived from human umbilical cord under hypoxic conditions (between 1.5% to 5% oxygen (O 2)) revealed a 2- to 3-fold reduced oxygen consumption rate as compared to the same cultures at normoxic oxygen levels (21% O 2). A simultaneous measurement of dissolved oxygen within the culture media from 4 different MSC donors ranged from 15 μmol/L at 1.5% O 2 to 196 μmol/L at normoxic 21% O 2. The proliferative capacity of the different hypoxic MSC populations was elevated as compared to the normoxic culture. This effect was paralleled by a significantly reduced cell damage or cell death under hypoxic conditions as evaluated by the cellular release of LDH whereby the measurement of caspase3/7 activity revealed little if any differences in apoptotic cell death between the various cultures. The MSC culture under hypoxic conditions was associated with the induction of hypoxia-inducing factor-alpha (HIF-1α) and an elevated expression of energy metabolism-associated genes including GLUT-1, LDH and PDK1. Concomitantly, a significantly enhanced glucose consumption and a corresponding lactate production could be observed in the hypoxic MSC cultures suggesting an altered metabolism of these human stem cells within the hypoxic environment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1478-811x-8-18

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In neurological diseases, proteomic analysis revealed that hypoxia enhances the expression of proteins associated with neuroprotection, neural survival, differentiation, and axonal and neurite growth compared to the secretome obtained from normoxia-cultured MSCs.

    “proteomic analysis revealed that hypoxia enhances the expression of proteins [128], [129], [130] associated to neuroprotection, neural survival, differentiation, and axonal and neurite growth, when compared to the secretome obtained from normoxia-cultured MSCs [128].”

    From Mesenchymal stem cell secretome for regenerative medicine: Where do we stand? (2025) · cites this paper as [130]

    The Results sections report increased HIF-1α protein and changes in metabolism-related gene expression in hypoxic versus normoxic umbilical cord-derived MSCs. Neither those passages nor searches for proteomic analysis, secretome, and neural-growth proteins yielded a finding about neuroprotective or neurite-growth proteins in the secretome. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • These metabolic findings are similar to those reported in other studies and are most likely attributed to a shift from aerobic respiration via oxidative phosphorylation to anaerobic respiration via glycolysis.

    “These findings are similar to those reported in other studies and are most likely attributed to a shift from aerobic respiration via oxidative phosphorylation to anaerobic respiration via glycolysis [50–52].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 241

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Brown MF Gratton TP Stuart JA Metabolic rate does not scale with body mass in cultured mammalian cells Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2007 292 R2115 2121 17234960

Authors
Lavrentieva, A., Majore, I., Kasper, C., & Hass, R.
Affiliations
  • Leibniz University Hannover (DE)
  • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE)
Corresponding author
Kasper, Cornelia
Venue
Cell Communication and Signaling
Published
2010-07-16
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
18-18
ISSN
1478-811X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2145489725
Cited by
241
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 10
FWCI
6.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Cell Communication and Signaling (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repository of Leibniz Universität Hannover (Leibniz Universität Hannover) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Repository of Leibniz Universität Hannover (Leibniz Universität Hannover) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Leibniz Universität Hannover (cc-by)
Funders
  • Queen's University Belfast
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • Queen's University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Mesenchymal stem cell research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Keywords
mesenchymal stem cells, umbilical cord, hypoxia, oxygen consumption, cell proliferation, cell death, apoptosis, HIF-1α, energy metabolism, glucose utilization, lactic acid production, GLUT1, PDK1, LDH

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review