Cited by 131Asthma and respiratory diseasesRNA Interference and Gene DeliveryAllergic Rhinitis and Sensitization

Chitosan IFN-γ-pDNA Nanoparticle (CIN) Therapy for Allergic Asthma

Open access
Kumar, Mukesh, Kong, Xiaoyuan, Behera, Aruna K, Hellermann, Gary R, Lockey, Richard F, Mohapatra, Shyam S·2003·Genetic Vaccines and Therapy

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Allergic subjects produce relatively low amounts of IFN-gamma, a pleiotropic Th-1 cytokine that downregulates Th2-associated airway inflammation and hyperresponsiveness (AHR), the hallmarks of allergic asthma. Adenovirus-mediated IFN-gamma gene transfer reduces AHR, Th2 cytokine levels and lung inflammation in mice, but its use would be limited by the frequency of gene delivery required; therefore, we tested chitosan/IFN-gamma pDNA nanoparticles (CIN) for in situ production of IFN-gamma and its in vivo effects. METHODS: CIN were administered to OVA-sensitized mice to investigate the possibility of using gene transfer to modulate ovalbumin (OVA)-induced inflammation and AHR. RESULTS: Mice treated with CIN exhibit significantly lower AHR to methacholine challenge and less lung histopathology. Production of IFN-gamma is increased after CIN treatment while the Th2-cytokines, IL-4 and IL-5, and OVA-specific serum IgE are reduced compared to control mice. AHR and eosinophilia are also significantly reduced by CIN therapy administered therapeutically in mice with established asthma. CIN was found to inhibit epithelial inflammation within 6 hours of delivery by inducing apoptosis of goblet cells. Experiments performed on STAT4-defective mice do not show reduction in AHR with CIN treatment, thus implicating STAT4 signaling in the mechanism of CIN action. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that mucosal CIN therapy can effectively reduce established allergen-induced airway inflammation and AHR.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1479-0556-1-3

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 131

Authors
Kumar, M., Kong, X., Behera, A. K., Hellermann, G. R., Lockey, R. F., & Mohapatra, S. S.
Affiliations
University of South Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Mohapatra, Shyam S
Venue
Genetic Vaccines and Therapy
Published
2003-10-27
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
3-3
ISSN
1479-0556 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2117176093
Cited by
131
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genetic Vaccines and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
Keywords
allergic asthma, chitosan nanoparticles, interferon-gamma, airway hyperresponsiveness, Th2 cytokines, ovalbumin sensitization, eosinophilia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review