HOP'N after-school project: an obesity prevention randomized controlled trial
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: This paper reports the primary outcomes of the Healthy Opportunities for Physical Activity and Nutrition (HOP'N) after-school project, which was an effectiveness trial designed to evaluate the prevention of childhood obesity through building the capacity of after-school staff to increase physical activity (PA) and fruit and vegetable (FV) opportunities. METHODS: We conducted a three-year, nested cross-sectional group randomized controlled effectiveness trial. After a baseline assessment year (2005-2006), schools and their after-school programs were randomized to the HOP'N after-school program (n = 4) or control (n = 3), and assessed for two subsequent years (intervention year 1, 2006-2007; intervention year 2, 2007-2008). Across the three years, 715 fourth grade students, and 246 third and fourth grade after-school program participants were included in the study. HOP'N included community government human service agency (Cooperative Extension) led community development efforts, a three-time yearly training of after-school staff, daily PA for 30 minutes following CATCH guidelines, a daily healthful snack, and a weekly nutrition and PA curriculum (HOP'N Club). Child outcomes included change in age- and gender-specific body mass index z-scores (BMIz) across the school year and PA during after-school time measured by accelerometers. The success of HOP'N in changing after-school program opportunities was evaluated by observations over the school year of after-school program physical activity sessions and snack FV offerings. Data were analyzed in 2009. RESULTS: The intervention had no impact on changes in BMIz. Overweight/obese children attending HOP'N after-school programs performed 5.92 minutes more moderate-to-vigorous PA per day after intervention, which eliminated a baseline year deficit of 9.65 minutes per day (p < 0.05) compared to control site overweight/obese children. Active recreation program time at HOP'N sites was 23.40 minutes (intervention year 1, p = 0.01) and 14.20 minutes (intervention year 2, p = 0.10) greater than control sites. HOP'N sites and control sites did not differ in the number of FV offered as snacks. CONCLUSIONS: The HOP'N program had a positive impact on overweight/obese children's PA and after-school active recreation time. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01015599.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Of the 3 studies reporting expansion of after-school physical activity, only one had >250 participants, and although 1 study reported more than 80% attendance, the other 2 studies did not report attendance rates.
“Indeed, of the 3 studies reporting expansion of after-school PA, only one had >250 participants,48 and although 1 study reported more than 80% attendance,58 the other 2 studies did not report attendance rates.58, 103”
From A mixed-studies systematic review and meta-analysis of school-based interventions to promote physical activity and/or reduce sedentary time in children (2020) · cites this paper as [48]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 33 · Cited by 143
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Yin Z J H Moore JB Humbles P Barbeau P Gutin B An after-school physical activity program for obesity prevention in children: The medical college of Georgia FitKid project Eval Health Prof 2005 28 1 67 89 10.1177/0163278704273079 15677388 · DOI
- Authors
- Dzewaltowski, D. A., Rosenkranz, R. R., Geller, K. S., Coleman, K. J., Welk, G. J., Hastmann, T. J., & Milliken, G. A.
- Affiliations
- Kansas State University (US)
- Kaiser Permanente (US)
- Iowa State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dzewaltowski, David A
- ORCID
- Venue
- International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 90
- ISSN
- 1479-5868 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3022613
- OpenAlex
- W2148167954
- Cited by
- 143
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 9.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- K-State Research Exchange (Kansas State University) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Agriculture
- National Institute of Food and Agriculture
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
- Keywords
- childhood obesity prevention, after-school programs, physical activity, fruit and vegetable intake, BMI z-score, cooperative extension, physical recreation, school health promotion, overweight children, nutrition curriculum, fourth grade, community development, accelerometer-measured activity, program evaluation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review