Cited by 47Colorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies ResearchLung Cancer Treatments and Mutations

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fc gamma receptor IIIa polymorphisms in advanced colorectal cancer patients correlated with response to anti-EGFR antibodies and clinical outcome

Open access

Abstract

Background: Anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies have shown efficacy in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). One of the mechanism is the antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) in which Fc region of the antibody binds to the Fc gamma receptors (FcγR) expressed by immune cells. The present study investigated the association between single nucleotide polymorphisms of FcγRIIa and FcγRIIIa and clinical outcome in mCRC treated with anti-EGFR antibodies. Methods: Seventy-four consecutive patients with mCRC were analyzed. The genotypes for FcγRIIa-131 histidine (H)/arginine (R), FcγRIIIa-158 valine (V)/phenylanaline (F) polymorphisms were evaluated by directly sequencing. Multiplex allele-specific polymerase chain reaction was performed for FcγRIIIa-158 valine (V)/phenylanaline (F). Correlations between FcγR polymorphisms, baseline patient and tumor features were studied by contingency tables and the chi-square test. The Kaplan-Meier product limit method was applied to the progression-free survival (PFS) curves. Univariate analysis was performed with the log-rank test. Cox proportional-hazards regression was used to analyze the effect of multiple risk factors on PFS. Results: FcγRIIIa polymorphisms were significantly associated with response to anti-EGFR-based therapy in 49 patients with kras wt tumors (p=0.035). There was not association with response for FcγRIIa polymorphisms. Furthermore, obtained results suggested that prognosis is particularly unfavorable for patients carrying the FcγRIIIa-158F/F genotype (median PFS V/V, V/F, F/F: 18.2 vs 17.3 vs 9.4 months). No prognostic ability was identified for FcγRIIa polymorphisms. Conclusions: In mCRC patients the presence of FcγRIIIa-F can predict resistance to anti-EGFR therapy and unfavorable prognosis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1479-5876-10-232

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 FcγRIIa determined by direct sequencing and FcγRIIIa allotyping by allele-specific PCR. v Upper Panel. FcγRIIa determined by direct sequencing: (a) Sequencing electropherogram obtained from a sample homozygous for allele FcγRIIa 131H/H; (b) Sequencing electropherogram obtained from a sample heterozygous for allele FcγRIIa 131H/R; (c) Sequencing electropherogram obtained from a sample homozygous for allele FcγRIIa 131R/R. Lower Panel. FcγRIIIa allotyping by allele-specific PCR. 100bp ladder marker, FcγRIIIa genotypes direct sequenced F/F, V/F and V/V control and CTL- negative control were represented. Examples represented respectively F/F (a), V/F (b) and V/V (c) patients.
Figure 1 FcγRIIa determined by direct sequencing and FcγRIIIa allotyping by allele-specific PCR. v Upper Panel. FcγRIIa determined by direct sequencing: (a) Sequencing electropherogram obtained from a sample homozygous for allele FcγRIIa 131H/H; (b) Sequencing electropherogram obtained from a sample heterozygous for allele FcγRIIa 131H/R; (c) Sequencing electropherogram obtained from a sample homozygous for allele FcγRIIa 131R/R. Lower Panel. FcγRIIIa allotyping by allele-specific PCR. 100bp ladder marker, FcγRIIIa genotypes direct sequenced F/F, V/F and V/V control and CTL- negative control were represented. Examples represented respectively F/F (a), V/F (b) and V/V (c) patients.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Progression-free survival curves according to FcγR polymorphisms on 49 mCR Cpatients. Progression-free survival was defined as time elapsed between treatment initiation and tumor progression (a) FcγRIIa: median PFS was 16.1 months in H/H patients (18 patients, 13 events) vs 18.2 months in H/R patients (27 patients, 23 events) vs 13.3 months in R/R patients (4 patients, 3 events); Log Rank test for three curves: p = 0.61. (b) FcγRIIIa: median PFS was 18.2 months in V/V patients (18 patients, 13 events) vs 17.3 months in V/F patients (26 patients, 25 events) vs 9.4 months in F/F patients (5 patients, 5 events); Log Rank test for three curves: p = 0.04.
Figure 2 Progression-free survival curves according to FcγR polymorphisms on 49 mCR Cpatients. Progression-free survival was defined as time elapsed between treatment initiation and tumor progression (a) FcγRIIa: median PFS was 16.1 months in H/H patients (18 patients, 13 events) vs 18.2 months in H/R patients (27 patients, 23 events) vs 13.3 months in R/R patients (4 patients, 3 events); Log Rank test for three curves: p = 0.61. (b) FcγRIIIa: median PFS was 18.2 months in V/V patients (18 patients, 13 events) vs 17.3 months in V/F patients (26 patients, 25 events) vs 9.4 months in F/F patients (5 patients, 5 events); Log Rank test for three curves: p = 0.04.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 47

Metadata

Authors
Calemma, R., Ottaiano, A., Trotta, A. M., Nasti, G., Romano, C., Napolitano, M., Galati, D., Borrelli, P., Zanotta, S., Cassata, A., Castello, G., Iaffaioli, V. R., & Scala, S.
Affiliations
Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" (IT)
Corresponding author
Scala, Stefania
Venue
Journal of Translational Medicine
Published
2012-11-21
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
232-232
ISSN
1479-5876 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2121910124
Cited by
47
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Translational Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Keywords
FcγRIIIa, FCGR2A, single nucleotide polymorphisms, metastatic colorectal cancer, anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody, antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, treatment response, progression-free survival, prognostic factors, KRAS wild-type tumors
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alleles, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Base Sequence, DNA Mutational Analysis, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Molecular Sequence Data, Neoplasm Metastasis, Neoplasm Staging, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Colorectal Neoplasms, Multivariate Analysis, Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras), Treatment Outcome, Receptors, IgG, Disease-Free Survival, ras Proteins, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review