Cited by 138Coffee research and impactsSports Performance and TrainingMuscle metabolism and nutrition

Dose response effects of a caffeine-containing energy drink on muscle performance: A repeated measures design

Open access
Del Coso, Juan, Salinero, Juan José, González-Millán, Cristina, Abián-Vicén, Javier, Pérez-González, Benito·2012·Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Energy drinks have become the most used caffeine-containing beverages in the sport setting. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of two doses of a caffeine-containing energy drink on muscle performance during upper- and lower-body power-load tests. METHODS: In a randomized order, twelve active participants ingested 1 and 3 mg of caffeine per kg of body weight using a commercially available energy drink (Fure®, ProEnergetics) or the same drink without caffeine (placebo; 0 mg/kg). After sixty minutes, resting metabolic rate, heart rate and blood pressure were determined. Then, half-squat and bench-press power production with loads from 10 to 100% of 1 repetition maximum was determined using a rotator encoder. RESULTS: In comparison to the placebo, the ingestion of the caffeinated drink increased mean arterial pressure (82 ± 7 < 88 ± 8 ≈ 90 ± 6 mmHg for 0 mg/kg, 1 mg/kg, 3 mg/kg of caffeine, respectively; P < 0.05) and heart rate (57 ± 7 < 59 ± 8 < 62 ± 8 beats/min, respectively; P < 0.05) at rest in a dose response manner, though it did not affect resting metabolic rate. While the ingestion of 1 mg/kg of caffeine did not affect maximal power during the power-load tests with respect to the placebo, 3 mg/kg increased maximal power in the half-squat (2554 ± 167 ≈ 2549 ± 161 < 2726 ± 167 W, respectively; P < 0.05) and bench-press actions (349 ± 34 ≈ 358 ± 35 < 375 ± 33 W, respectively; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A caffeine dose of at least 3 mg/kg in the form of an energy drink is necessary to significantly improve half-squat and bench-press maximal muscle power.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1550-2783-9-21

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Muscle velocity and muscle power assessment require optimal neuromuscular conditions, and studies analyzing supplement effects on muscular velocity and power selected a maximum of two repetitions with a submaximal load, with recovery periods of 2−5 min.

    “Muscle velocity and muscle power assessment require optimal neuromuscular conditions and, as such, studies analyzing the effect of different supplements on muscular velocity and power selected a maximum of two repetitions with a submaximal load, with recovery periods of 2−5 min [117,118,119,120,121,122].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 49 · Cited by 138

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Del Coso J Muñoz V Effects of a caffeine-containing energy drink on soccer performance 2010 Sanitas, Madrid PMC3279366 22348079

Authors
Del Coso, J., Salinero, J. J., González-Millán, C., Abián-Vicén, J., & Pérez-González, B.
Affiliations
  • Exercise Physiology LaboratoryCamilo José Cela University C/ Castillo de Alarcon, 49 28692 Villafranca del Castillo Spain
  • Camilo José Cela University (ES)
Venue
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
Published
2012-02-06
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
21-21
ISSN
1550-2783 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2098959004
Cited by
138
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RUIdeRA - Institutional University Repository (University of Castilla-La Mancha) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Keywords
caffeine, energy drinks, muscle power, dose-response relationship, half squat, bench press, maximum power, blood pressure, heart rate, resting metabolic rate, sports nutrition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review